Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on May 26, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(9):1936-1943; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh898
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/9/1936    most recent
gfh898v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fragedaki, E.
Right arrow Articles by Stopper, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fragedaki, E.
Right arrow Articles by Stopper, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org


Original Article

Genomic damage and circulating AGE levels in patients undergoing daily versus standard haemodialysis

Evangelia Fragedaki1, Michael Nebel2, Nicole Schupp1, Katarina Sebekova3, Wolfgang Völkel1, André Klassen4, Monika Pischetsrieder5, Matthias Frischmann5, Toshimitsu Niwa6, Jörg Vienken7, August Heidland4 and Helga Stopper1

1 Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Germany, 2 Kuratorium for Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Cologne, Germany, 3 Slovak Medical University, Institute of Preventive and Clinical Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia, 4 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Würzburg, Germany, 5 Institute of Pharmacy and Food Chemistry, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany, 6 Daiko Medical Center, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan and 7 Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany

Correspondence and offprint request to: Prof. Dr Helga Stopper, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Versbacherstr. 9, D-97080 Würzburg, Germany. Email: stopper{at}toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de

Background. Patients with end-stage renal failure, whether on conservative or haemodialysis therapy, have a high incidence of DNA damage. It is not known if improved control of the uraemic state by daily haemodialysis (DHD) reduces DNA lesions.

Methods. DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) was evaluated in a cross-sectional study of 13 patients on DHD (2–3 h, 6 times/week), 12 patients on standard haemodialysis (SHD) therapy (4–5 h, 3 times/week) and 12 healthy age-matched volunteer controls. The biomarker of DNA damage used was micronucleus frequency. The assessed plasma parameters of microinflammation and oxidative stress were C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), neopterin, advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and homocysteine. We also measured plasma concentrations of the circulating advanced glycation end products (AGEs) MGI (methylglyoxal-derived imidazolinone), CML (carboxymethyllysine), imidazolone A (3-deoxyglucosone-derived imidazolinone) and AGE-associated fluorescence.

Results. Compared to SHD, DHD was associated with significantly lower DNA damage, approaching the normal range. Micronuclei (MN) frequency averaged 29.1 MN±5.9/1000 binucleated (BN) cells in the SHD group, which is significantly elevated (P<0.01), 14.8 MN±4.0/1000 BN cells in the DHD group, and 13.2 MN±3.04/1000 BN cells in the controls. CRP and AOPP were in the normal range (and similar between the dialysis groups). In contrast, IL-6 and neopterin were significantly elevated, with lower values associated with DHD as compared with SHD. The increased levels of AGEs tended to be lower in the DHD group, reaching significance for CML and imidazolone A.

Conclusions. Overall, it was found that genomic damage in PBLs is lower in patients on DHD than in those on SHD. Lower plasma concentrations of uraemic toxins, including circulating AGEs, may account for the differences. To confirm these data, prospective clinical trials need to be performed.

Keywords: advanced glycation endproducts; daily haemodialysis; micronuclei frequency; oxidative stress


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. Stopper, A.-T. Treutlein, U. Bahner, N. Schupp, U. Schmid, A. Brink, A. Perna, and A. Heidland
Reduction of the genomic damage level in haemodialysis patients by folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 3272 - 3279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.