Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on April 26, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(8):1638-1642; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh855
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/8/1638    most recent
gfh855v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Pandey, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agarwal, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Pandey, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org


Original Article

Prevalence of chronic renal failure in adults in Delhi, India

Sanjay Kumar Agarwal1, Suresh Chand Dash1, Mohammad Irshad2, Sreebhuasn Raju1, Ravinder Singh1 and Ravinder Mohan Pandey3

Departments of 1 Nephrology, 2 Laboratory Medicine and 3 Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Sanjay Kumar Agarwal, Department of Nephrology, AIIMS, New Delhi-110029, India. Email: skagarwal58{at}yahoo.co.in

Background. Chronic renal failure (CRF) is a debilitating condition responsible for high morbidity and mortality and is a financial burden on government and society. Because of its costs and the complexity of its treatment, proper care is available to very few patients in India. A community-based study has not been done to determine the prevalence of CRF in India.

Methods. We used a multi-stage cluster sampling method in the South Zones of Delhi. In each area, we first contacted the local social leader and explained the study and the medical information pamphlets. On pre-scheduled days, the study team canvassed the study zone. The individuals contacted responded to a detailed questionnaire, and had a physical examination, a dipstick urine test for albumin and sugar and a blood test for serum creatinine. A serum creatinine >1.8 mg% defined renal failure. A repeat test for serum creatinine was done after 8–12 weeks to confirm chronicity of renal failure. If it was >1.8 mg% after 3 months in the absence of reversible factors, CRF was diagnosed. The person found to have CRF was asked to attend a hospital renal clinic for further investigations and individualized management.

Results. A total of 4972 persons were contacted for the study. Their mean age was 42±13 years; 56% were males. Out of the 4972 who were initially approached, 4712 agreed to give the blood sample, and thus were included for the evaluation of CRF. CRF was found in 37 of them. Thus, the prevalence of CRF in that adult population was 0.785% or 7852/million.

Conclusions. The prevalence of CRF in India makes it a serious problem in need of urgent efforts to contain it.

Keywords: chronic renal failure; Delhi; India; prevalence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
N Udayakumar
Chronic kidney disease in India: from a resident physician's perspective
Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2006; 82(973): 697 - 698.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. C. Dash and S. K. Agarwal
Incidence of chronic kidney disease in India
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 232 - 233.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.