NDT Advance Access originally published online on August 9, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(11):2376-2384; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi025
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dose-reducing H2 receptor antagonists in the presence of low glomerular filtration rate: a systematic review of the evidence
1 Division of Nephrology and 6 Department of Epidemiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, 2 Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, 3 Departments of Medicine and Health Policy Management Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, 4 Division of Geriatric Medicine and 5 Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Amit Garg, MD, PhD, London Kidney Clinical Research Unit, Room A01, Westminster Tower, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario N6A 4G5, Canada. Email: Amit.Garg{at}lhsc.on.ca
Background. While it is recommended that H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) be dose reduced in the presence of low glomerular filtration rate (GFR), in practice such adjustments often do not occur. We reviewed the evidence for this recommendation.
Methods. We searched multiple medical reference databases for relevant cohort studies and randomized clinical trials. Studies that enrolled five or more participants with low GFR who also received at least one unadjusted dose of an H2RA, and who were compared with controls were included. Data were abstracted on study and participant characteristics and drug-related adverse effects. Pharmacokinetic measures were pooled using meta-analysis.
Results. A total of 22 articles were included, comprising 19 unique cohort studies. With declining GFR, there was a significant increase in the area under the curve (AUC) and elimination half-life (t1/2) of the serum drug concentration of H2RAs (P<0.001). Compared with a GFR >80 ml/min/1.73 m2, drug AUC increased by 200% when the GFR was 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, and by 300% when the GFR was 20 ml/min/1.73 m2. In hospitalized patients with low GFR, reducing the interval dose of intravenous H2RA was associated with fewer adverse reactions. The gastro-protective effects of H2RAs were similar with reduced and unadjusted doses.
Conclusions. Reducing the dose of H2RAs in persons with low GFR will decrease drug expenditure and may prevent adverse events, without a change in efficacy. Quality assurance programmes, which improve deficiencies in H2RAs prescribing, appear justified.
Keywords: H2 receptor antagonist; kidney function tests; meta-analysis
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Mrkobrada, H. Thiessen-Philbrook, R. B. Haynes, A. V. Iansavichus, F. Rehman, and A. X. Garg Need for Quality Improvement in Renal Systematic Reviews Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 3(4): 1102 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Matsuzaki, T. Morisaki, W. Sugimoto, K. Yokoo, D. Sato, H. Nonoguchi, K. Tomita, T. Terada, K.-i. Inui, A. Hamada, et al. Altered Pharmacokinetics of Cationic Drugs Caused by Down-Regulation of Renal Rat Organic Cation Transporter 2 (Slc22a2) and Rat Multidrug and Toxin Extrusion 1 (Slc47a1) in Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2008; 36(4): 649 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|