Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on July 19, 2005
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(10):2089-2096; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfi006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/10/2089    most recent
gfi006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anandarajah, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hilton, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anandarajah, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hilton, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org


Original Article

The validity of searching routinely collected general practice computer data to identify patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD): a manual review of 500 medical records

Sobana Anandarajah1, Tracy Tai1, Simon de Lusignan2, Paul Stevens3, Donal O'Donoghue4, Mel Walker5 and Sean Hilton1

1 St George's and 2 Primary Care Informatics, Division of Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK, 3 Department of Renal Medicine, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Ethelbert Road, Canterbury, Kent CT1 3NG, UK, 4 Department of Renal Medicine, Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD, UK and 5 Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, AL7 3AY, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Simon de Lusignan, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK. Email: slusigna{at}sgul.ac.uk

Background. We conducted a search of 12 practices’ routinely collected computer data in three localities across the UK and found that 4.9% of the registered population had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (equivalent to stages 3–5 CKD). Only 3.6% of these were known to have renal disease. Although UK general practice is computerized, important clinical data might be recorded in letters or free-text computer entries and might therefore be invisible to the standard computer search tools. We therefore manually searched through all the records of patients with stages 3–5 CKD in one practice, to test the validity of the computer generated diagnosis and to see if other relevant information was missed by the computer search.

Methods. We identified 492 people with stages 3–5 CKD using computer searching and then manually searched their computer records and written notes for any missed data. The dataset included cardiovascular morbidities and risk factors including diabetes; drugs which may impair renal function; known renal disease; and terminal diagnoses and dementia.

Results. The manual searches only added four renal diagnoses to the 36 already identified. Although heart failure and stroke appear to be over-estimated by computer searches, other cardiovascular diagnoses were reliably recorded. Cardiovascular risk factors and drug recording is a strength of general practice computer data. It is complete and contemporary, though most patients had scope to have their cardiovascular risk reduced further. Eighty-four percent had a haemoglobin estimation, and a higher proportion with reduced renal function were anaemic (P<0.001). Testing for proteinuria was less well recorded; negative stick tests were not recorded. Clinical diagnoses of prostatism and bladder outflow problems made these data hard to interpret.

Conclusions. Automated searching of general practice computer records could provide a reliable and valid way of identifying people with stages 3–5 CKD who could benefit from interventions readily available in primary care.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease; computerized medical records system; computers; family practice; glomerular filtration rate; mass screening


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Ferrari, J. Xiao, A. Ukich, and A. Irish
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate: does haemoglobin discriminate between ageing and true CKD?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1828 - 1833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
N. J. Howell, B. E. Keogh, R. S. Bonser, T. R. Graham, J. Mascaro, S. J. Rooney, I. C. Wilson, and D. Pagano
Mild renal dysfunction predicts in-hospital mortality and post-discharge survival following cardiac surgery.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 34(2): 390 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. G. Glynn, D. Reddan, J. Newell, J. Hinde, B. Buckley, and A. W. Murphy
Chronic kidney disease and mortality and morbidity among patients with established cardiovascular disease: a West of Ireland community-based cohort study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2586 - 2594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Klebe, J. Irving, P. E. Stevens, D. J. O'Donoghue, S. de Lusignan, R. Cooley, H. Hobbs, E. J. Lamb, I. John, R. Middleton, et al.
The cost of implementing UK guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2504 - 2512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. S. MacGregor
How common is early chronic kidney disease?: A Background Paper prepared for the UK Consensus Conference on Early Chronic Kidney Disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(suppl_9): ix8 - ix18.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Tomlinson
How Do We Re-Design the Treatment?: A Background Paper prepared for the UK Consensus Conference on Early Chronic Kidney Disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(suppl_9): ix39 - ix44.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
B. Klebe, C. Farmer, R. Cooley, S. de Lusignan, R. Middleton, D. O'Donoghue, J. New, and P. Stevens
Kidney disease management in UK primary care: guidelines, incentives and Information Technology
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2007; 24(4): 330 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Traynor, R. Mactier, C. C Geddes, and J. G Fox
How to measure renal function in clinical practice.
BMJ, October 7, 2006; 333(7571): 733 - 737.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.