Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chertow, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ahlmén, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chertow, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ahlmén, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: 1571-1575
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 No. 6 © ERA-EDTA 2004; all rights reserved


Original Article

On the relative safety of parenteral iron formulations

Glenn M. Chertow1, Phillip D. Mason2, Odd Vaage-Nilsen3 and Jarl Ahlmén4

1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2Oxford Kidney Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK, 3Nebo a/s, Holbaek, Denmark and 4Department of Renal Medicine, Skaraborgs Hospital, Skövde, Sweden

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Glenn M. Chertow, MD, MPH, Department of Medicine Research, University of California San Francisco, UCSF Laurel Heights Suite 430, 3333 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94118-1211, USA. Email: chertowg{at}medicine.ucsf.edu

Background. Intravenous iron is usually required to optimize the correction of anaemia in persons with advanced chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Randomized clinical trials may have insufficient power to detect differences in the safety profiles of specific formulations.

Methods. We obtained data from the US Food and Drug Administration on reported adverse drug events (ADEs) related to the provision of three formulations of intravenous iron during 1998–2000. We estimated the relative risks [odds ratios (OR)] of ADEs associated with the use of higher molecular weight iron dextran and sodium ferric gluconate complex compared with lower molecular weight iron dextran using 2 x 2 tables.

Results. The total number of reported parenteral iron-related ADEs was 1981 among ~21 060 000 doses administered, yielding a rate of 9.4 x 10–5, or ~94 per million. Total major ADEs were significantly increased among recipients of higher molecular weight iron dextran (OR 5.5, 95% CI 4.9–6.0) and sodium ferric gluconate complex (OR 6.2, 95% CI 5.4–7.2) compared with recipients of lower molecular weight iron dextran. We observed significantly higher rates of life-threatening ADEs, including death, anaphylactoid reaction, cardiac arrest and respiratory depression among users of higher molecular weight compared with lower molecular weight iron dextran. There was insufficient power to detect differences in life-threatening ADEs when comparing lower molecular weight iron dextran with sodium ferric gluconate complex.

Conclusions. Parenteral iron-related ADEs are rare. Using observational data, overall and most specific ADE rates were significantly higher among recipients of higher molecular weight iron dextran and sodium ferric gluconate complex than among recipients of lower molecular weight iron dextran. These data may help to guide clinical practice, as head-to-head clinical trials comparing different formulations of intravenous iron have not been conducted.

Keywords: adverse drug events; iron dextran; parenteral iron; sodium ferric gluconate complex


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
S. B. Silverstein, J. A. Gilreath, and G. M. Rodgers
Intravenous Iron Therapy: A Summary of Treatment Options and Review of Guidelines
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2008; 21(6): 431 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
A. Hayat
Safety Issues With Intravenous Iron Products in the Management of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease
Clin. Med. Res., December 1, 2008; 6(3-4): 93 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
O. Vaage-Nilsen
Acute, severe and anaphylactoid reactions are very rare with low-molecular-weight iron dextran, CosmoFer(R)
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 3372 - 3372.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol Pharm PractHome page
S. S Shord, J.M. Hamilton Jr, and S. Cuellar
Parenteral iron with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for chemotherapy-induced anemia
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 5 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
D. W. Johnson
INTRAVENOUS VERSUS ORAL IRON SUPPLEMENTATION IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS
Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S255 - S260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
W. H. Horl
Clinical Aspects of Iron Use in the Anemia of Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 382 - 393.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. M. Chertow, P. D. Mason, O. Vaage-Nilsen, and J. Ahlmen
Update on adverse drug events associated with parenteral iron
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 378 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
C. E Saadeh and G. Srkalovic
Acute Hypersensitivity Reaction to Ferric Gluconate in a Premedicated Patient
Ann. Pharmacother., December 1, 2005; 39(12): 2124 - 2127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Michael
The safety of sodium ferric gluconate complex in haemodialysis patients has been extensively evaluated
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 1770 - 1770.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
I. C Macdougall, K.-U. Eckardt, W. Horl, and On behalf of the Working Group for the revised EPB
Reply
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1513 - 1514.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
O. Vaage-Nilsen
Revised European Best Practice Guidelines for the management of anaemia in patients with chronic renal failure, part III.2: treatment of anaemia with iron
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1512 - 1513.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. A. J. Walters and D. B. Van Wyck
Benchmarking iron dextran sensitivity: reactions requiring resuscitative medication in incident and prevalent patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1438 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. R. Bailie, J. A. Clark, C. E. Lane, and P. L. Lane
Hypersensitivity reactions and deaths associated with intravenous iron preparations
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1443 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. Bhowmik and S. C. Tiwari
Do we need to change our administration practice with regard to sodium ferric gluconate complex in glucose?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1279 - 1279.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.