Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischbach, M.
Right arrow Articles by Haraldsson, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fischbach, M.
Right arrow Articles by Haraldsson, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: 925-932
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 No. 4 © ERA-EDTA 2004; all rights reserved


Original Article

Effect of peritoneal dialysis fluid composition on peritoneal area available for exchange in children

Michel Fischbach1, Joëlle Terzic1, Sylvie Chauvé2, Vincent Laugel1, Audrey Muller3 and Börje Haraldsson4

1Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Children's Unit, Strasbourg, 2Baxter SAS, Maurepas, 3Pharmacological University, Strasbourg, France and 4Department of Nephrology, Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Michel Fischbach, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Children's Unit, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg, France. Email: Michel.Fischbach{at}chru-strasbourg.fr

Background. Although conventional peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs), such as Dianeal®, are non-physiological in composition, new PDFs including Physioneal® have a more neutral pH, are at least partially buffered with bicarbonate and, most importantly, contain low concentrations of glucose degradation products (GDPs).

Methods. To evaluate the impact of new PDFs in childcare, we performed a comparative crossover study with Dianeal® and Physioneal®. We examined both intraperitoneal pressure (IPP), which partly reflects pain induction, and the total pore area available for exchange, which indicates the number of capillaries perfused in the peritoneal membrane at any given moment and therefore partly reflects peritoneal dialysis capacity. The IPP was determined after inflow of 1000 ml/m2 body surface area (BSA) of dialysate (intraperitoneal volume; IPV). The steady-state unrestricted area over diffusion distance (A0/{triangleup}x, in cm2/cm per 1.73 m2 BSA) was calculated from the three-pore theory. Six children were enrolled in the study. On the first day, two consecutive peritoneal equilibration tests of 90 min each were performed using first Dianeal® and then Physioneal®. On the second study day, the procedure was repeated with the fluids given in the opposite order.

Results. The mean IPP normalized to IPV (ml/m2) was significantly higher for Dianeal® (9.5 ± 0.9 cm/1000 ml/m2) than for Physioneal® (7.9 ± 1.2 cm/1000 ml/m2, P < 0.01). The mean A0/{triangleup}x was 17 ± 4% larger with Dianeal® (36 095 ± 2009 cm2/cm per 1.73 m2) than with Physioneal® (31 780 ± 2185 cm2/cm per 1.73 m2, P < 0.001; based on 24 data pairs).

Conclusions. These pilot study results suggest a higher biocompatibility for Physioneal® than for Dianeal®. Less inflow pain associated with Physioneal® induced a lower IPP reflecting enhanced fill volume tolerance, and the lower A0/{triangleup}x reflected less capillary recruitment. Taken together, these results suggest that the new more biocompatible PDFs will improve peritoneal dialysis therapy, although this conclusion will require verification in extended clinical trials.

Keywords: capillary recruitment; children; intraperitoneal pressure; peritoneal dialysis fluid


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
pdiHome page
R. T. Krediet
BIOCOMPATIBILITY AND PERITONEAL TRANSPORT
Perit. Dial. Int., March 1, 2009; 29(2): 147 - 149.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. P. Schmitt, D. von Heyl, S. Rieger, K. Arbeiter, K. E. Bonzel, M. Fischbach, J. Misselwitz, A.-K. Pieper, F. Schaefer, and for the Mid European Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis
Reduced systemic advanced glycation end products in children receiving peritoneal dialysis with low glucose degradation product content
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2038 - 2044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
pdiHome page
M. Fischbach, C. Dheu, L. Seuge-Dargnies, and J. F. Delobbe
ADEQUACY OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IN CHILDREN: CONSIDER THE MEMBRANE FOR OPTIMAL PRESCRIPTION
Perit. Dial. Int., June 1, 2007; 27(Supplement_2): S167 - S170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. H. Schroder
Optimal peritoneal dialysis: choice of volume and solution
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 782 - 784.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.