Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on July 27, 2004
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2004 19(10):2634-2638; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh422
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/10/2634    most recent
gfh422v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grover, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fine, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grover, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fine, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 No. 10 © ERA-EDTA 2004; all rights reserved


Technical Note

Lack of clinical utility of urine myoglobin detection by microconcentrator ultrafiltration in the diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis

Davinder S. Grover1, Mohamed G. Atta1, Joseph A. Eustace1, Thomas S. Kickler2 and Derek M. Fine1

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and 2 Departments of Pathology, Oncology and Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Derek M. Fine, MD, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 E. Monument Street, Suite 416, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Email: dfine1{at}jhmi.edu

Abstract

Background. In the diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis, the microconcentrator qualitative assay for urine myoglobin (uMb) is often used as a screening tool. The accuracy and clinical utility of this assay in screening patients with rhabdomyolysis have not been examined.

Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the relationship between creatine kinase (CK), serum myoglobin (sMb), the urine qualitative assay for myoglobin and the semi-quantitative assay for urine haem pigments (uH) in patients evaluated for rhabdomyolysis.

Results. There were 673 patients with CK and uMb recorded on the same day. The uMb assay had a sensitivity of only 26.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 23.1–29.7%] and specificity of 96.8% (95% CI: 95.5–98.1%) for the detection of severe rhabdomyolysis, defined as a CK >10 000 U/l. SMb and CK measured simultaneously in 83 patients were highly correlated (R2 = 0.72 for log-transformed values), suggesting that the negative uMb test was not a result of the absence of sMb. In 241 patients who had CK, uMb and uH measured on the same day, the presence of ‘moderate’ or ‘large’ uH in the absence of haematuria, indicating presence of myoglobinuria, had a sensitivity of 81% (95% CI: 76–86%) for the detection of CK >10 000 U/l vs a sensitivity of 22% (95% CI: 17–27%) for the uMb assay.

Conclusions. The microconcentrator-based uMb assay has a poor and clinically inadequate sensitivity in the detection and diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis.

Keywords: creatine kinase; diagnosis; microconcentrator; myoglobin; rhabdomyolysis; urine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
S. Dehoney and M. Wellein
Rhabdomyolysis associated with the nutritional supplement Hydroxycut
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., January 15, 2009; 66(2): 142 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.