Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Einecke, G.
Right arrow Articles by Budde, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Einecke, G.
Right arrow Articles by Budde, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2004) 19: 215-222
© European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Original Article

The value of C2 monitoring in stable renal allograft recipients on maintenance immunosuppression

Gunilla Einecke1, Ingrid Mai2, Lutz Fritsche1, Torsten Slowinski1, Johannes Waiser1, Hans-Hellmut Neumayer1 and Klemens Budde1

1Department of Nephrology and 2Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Gunilla Einecke, Department of Nephrology, Charité, Humboldt University, Schumannstrasse 20–21, D-10117 Berlin, Germany. Email: gunilla.einecke{at}charite.de

Background. Cyclosporin A (CyA) is a drug with a narrow therapeutic window and highly variable pharmacokinetics. Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential and conventionally has been guided by trough levels (C0). Recent evidence indicates that a single blood concentration measurement 2 h after CyA administration (C2) is a more accurate predictor of drug exposure and clinical events than determination of C0. To date, limited prospective data are available with respect to risks and benefits of C2 monitoring in renal transplant recipients, and little experience exists with C2 monitoring in maintenance patients.

Methods. In 127 long-term renal allograft recipients, we determined C2 levels in addition to conventional C0 and observed clinical outcome over a period of 13.6 ± 3.1 months. To determine the precision of monitoring, we repeatedly determined C0 and C2 levels in 46 stable patients without dose change.

Results. Clinical outcome was excellent (patient survival 100%, graft survival 97%), with only two borderline rejections, although C2 levels (564 ± 186 ng/ml) were lower than recommended so far for maintenance patients. We found no significant differences in C2 levels between patients with rejection and CyA toxicity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed no prediction for risk of rejection, toxicity or infection by C2 levels. Repeated determinations of both C0 and C2 levels in 46 patients revealed a high intra-patient variability. In these patients, the coefficient of variation for C2 was only marginally better compared with C0.

Conclusions. We conclude that in maintenance patients, C2 concentrations between 500 and 600 ng/ml are well tolerated and provide effective and safe rejection prophylaxis. Although mean C2 levels do not seem to be helpful in identifying patients at risk for rejection, they may be useful to detect over-immunosuppression and to improve long-term allograft survival further by reducing CyA nephrotoxicity.

Keywords: C2 monitoring; cyclosporin A; maintenance immunosuppression; pharmacokinetics; renal transplant


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
U. Sester, H. Wilkens, K. van Bentum, M. Singh, G. W. Sybrecht, H-J. Schafers, and M. Sester
Impaired detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis immunity in patients using high levels of immunosuppressive drugs
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2009; 34(3): 702 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Sommerer, T. Giese, S. Meuer, and M. Zeier
Pharmacodynamic monitoring of calcineurin inhibitor therapy: Is there a clinical benefit?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 21 - 27.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Buchler, S. Chadban, E. Cole, K. Midtvedt, E. Thervet, H. Prestele, and P. Keown
Evolution of the absorption profile of cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of the de novo and maintenance phases
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 197 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Marcen, J. J. Villafruela, J. Pascual, J. L. Teruel, J. Ocana, M. T. Tenorio, F. J. Burgos, and J. Ortuno
Clinical outcomes and C2 cyclosporin monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: 1 year follow-up study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 803 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.