Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ostermann, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ostermann, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 1644-1647
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Brief Report

Haemodialysis patients’ views on their resuscitation status

Maria E. Ostermann and Stephen R. Nelson

Department of Renal Medicine & Transplantation, St George’s Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence and offprint requests to: M. E. Ostermann, Department of Renal Medicine & Transplantation, St George’s Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK. Email: marlies{at}ostermann.freeserve.co.uk

Background. Guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) recommend that decisions about resuscitation are part of every patient’s care plan. We aimed to ascertain the initial views of a haemodialysis cohort in the UK regarding their CPR status in the event of an in-hospital cardiac arrest not related to dialysis.

Methods. During outpatient clinic follow-up between January and March 2001, 66 haemodialysis patients were interviewed by one of two interviewers. A standard interview format was used, which included information on complications and outcome of CPR in haemodialysis patients. Patients had no prior opportunity to discuss the issue with a third party.

Results. Fifty patients (76%) wished to receive CPR. Five patients decided against CPR, of whom two were depressed. Six patients were undecided. Five patients were excluded from the analysis because of lack of mental capacity or language difficulties. Patients who wished to receive CPR were significantly younger (59 ± 16 vs 74 ± 10 years, respectively; P < 0.01) and had a significantly higher serum albumin level compared with those who did not opt for CPR or were undecided. There was no difference in gender, comorbidity, length of time on dialysis, proportion of patients with adequate dialysis and mean haemoglobin level between those who wished CPR and those who did not.

Conclusions. The majority of haemodialysis patients wished to receive CPR. These patients were younger than those who did not opt for CPR. Clearer strategies on third-party consultation and follow-up interviews are needed to guarantee that patients’ wishes are respected at all times.

Keywords: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; haemodialysis patients


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
F Tyrer, M Williams, L Feathers, C Faull, and I Baker
Factors that influence decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the views of doctors and medical students
Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2009; 85(1009): 564 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.