Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cremers, S. C. L. M.
Right arrow Articles by de Fijter, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cremers, S. C. L. M.
Right arrow Articles by de Fijter, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 1201-1208
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

A compartmental pharmacokinetic model of cyclosporin and its predictive performance after Bayesian estimation in kidney and simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplant recipients

Serge C. L. M. Cremers1,, Eduard M. Scholten2, Rik C. Schoemaker3, Eef G. W. M. Lentjes4, Pieter Vermeij1, Leendert C. Paul2, Jan den Hartigh1 and Johan W. de Fijter2

1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, 2 Department of Nephrology, 3 Centre for Human Drug Research and 4 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Background. Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporin A (CsA) is an obvious necessity because of its unpredictable absorption and narrow therapeutic window. The use of limited sampling models (LSMs) has improved the estimation of the systemic exposure [area under curve (AUC)] compared with C0h monitoring, but these equations are rigid and not reliable in patients with an abnormal absorption profile. We developed and validated a limited sampling (t=0, 2 and 3 h) strategy, based on a compartmental population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for CsA after kidney transplantation alone (KTA) and simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients, a group of patients with unpredictable absorption kinetics.

Methods. A two-compartment model with lag time and first-order absorption was calculated using a PK software package from data of 20 KTA and SPKT recipients and validated prospectively in 20 KTA and 20 SPKT recipients. Calculated population PK parameters were individualized for each of the remaining 40 patients based on their CsA dosing and on one or a combination of measured CsA blood concentrations using the Bayesian fitting method. AUCs were calculated from individualized PK parameters. AUCs were also calculated using previously published LSMs. Relationships between AUCs calculated by the models and the ‘golden standard’ AUC (trapezoidal rule) were investigated by Pearson correlation test.

Results and conclusions. A population two-compartment model is presented to reliably estimate the CsA AUC in KTA and SPKT recipients. The performance of the model to estimate the AUC is comparable to the performance of two published LSMs in KTA patients, but markedly better in SPKT patients. Combined with Bayesian fitting, the model is very flexible since sampling times are not rigid and can be varied as long as dosing and sampling times are recorded accurately. The model has already proven to be clinically useful and is currently used to further investigate CsA in an integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Keywords: Bayesian; cyclosporin; kidney transplant; pharmacokinetics; simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplant

Correspondence and offprint requests to: S. C. L. M. Cremers, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, NL-2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. Email: S.C.L.M.Cremers{at}lumc.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
H. H. van Rossum, F. P.H.T.M. Romijn, K. J. Sellar, N. P.M. Smit, P. J.M. van der Boog, J. W. de Fijter, and J. van Pelt
Variation in Leukocyte Subset Concentrations Affects Calcineurin Activity Measurement: Implications for Pharmacodynamic Monitoring Strategies
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2008; 54(3): 517 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
E. M. Scholten, A. T. Rowshani, S. Cremers, F. J. Bemelman, M. Eikmans, E. van Kan, M. J. Mallat, S. Florquin, J. Surachno, I. J. ten Berge, et al.
Untreated Rejection in 6-Month Protocol Biopsies Is Not Associated with Fibrosis in Serial Biopsies or with Loss of Graft Function
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2006; 17(9): 2622 - 2632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. C. Roos-van Groningen, E. M. Scholten, P. M. Lelieveld, A. T. Rowshani, H. J. Baelde, I. M. Bajema, S. Florquin, F. J. Bemelman, E. de Heer, J. W. de Fijter, et al.
Molecular Comparison of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Induced Fibrogenic Responses in Protocol Renal Transplant Biopsies
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2006; 17(3): 881 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.