Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Locatelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Locatelli, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 1061-1065
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Personal Opinion

Dose of dialysis, convection and haemodialysis patients outcome—what the HEMO study doesn't tell us: the European viewpoint

Francesco Locatelli

Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, A. Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy

Keywords: convection; dialysis adequacy; dialysis dose; dialysis morbidity and mortality; multicentre trial

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The main aims of dialysis treatment are to prolong patient survival, reduce morbidity and improve quality of life. However, despite many technical advances made over the last few years, morbidity and mortality of dialysis patients remain unacceptably high [1] and their quality of life is often poor.

The delivered dose of dialysis can affect morbidity and mortality of dialysis patients [2]. Moreover, in the last decade, several epidemiological studies, based mainly on longitudinal database registries, have suggested a possible superiority of convective dialysis treatments in improving patient outcome [3–7]. Thus, in addition to the dose of dialysis delivered, the size of molecules removed can also be of importance. In a randomized controlled study of 380 patients, Locatelli et al. [8] compared four dialysis modalities (cuprophan dialysis, low- and high-flux polysulfone dialysis, and high-flux polysulfone haemodiafiltration). While there was no . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Dialysis dose

Dialysis dose and treatment failure: the National Cooperative Dialysis Study

Dialysis dose and mortality

Dialyzer flux

The HEMO study

Design and methods
Results

Study sample selection bias
Dialysis parameters
Body water volume
Prevalent patients
Statistical evaluation
Membrane Permeability Outcome study

Conclusions


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A Power, N Duncan, and C Goodlad
Advances and innovations in dialysis in the 21st century
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2009; 85(1000): 102 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. V. Rocco, A. K. Cheung, T. Greene, G. Eknoyan, and for the Hemodialysis Study Group
The HEMO Study: applicability and generalizability
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 278 - 284.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Locatelli, U. Buoncristiani, B. Canaud, H. Kohler, T. Petitclerc, and P. Zucchelli
Dialysis dose and frequency
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 285 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]