Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gabutti, L.
Right arrow Articles by Marone, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gabutti, L.
Right arrow Articles by Marone, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 2369-2376
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Original Article

Unexpected haemodynamic instability associated with standard bicarbonate haemodialysis

Luca Gabutti1, Nicola Ferrari2, Giacomo Giudici2, Giorgio Mombelli2 and Claudio Marone3

1Department of Nephrology and 2Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale la Carità, Locarno and 3Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Luca Gabutti, Department of Nephrology, Ospedale la Carità, Via Ospedale, 6600 Locarno, Switzerland. Email: luca.gabutti{at}eoc.ch

Background. The bicarbonate concentration in dialysis fluids for intermittent haemodialysis usually is between 32 and 35 mmol/l. The severity of chronic metabolic acidosis secondary to end-stage renal failure is very variable, however, so that in some patients pre-dialysis acidosis is overcorrected. This study aimed to analyse haemodynamic tolerances to metabolic alkalosis during intermittent haemodialysis.

Methods. In this randomized controlled trial with a single blind, cross-over design, we used dialysis liquids with two different bicarbonate concentrations, 32 (modality A) and 26 (modality B) mmol/l, and in 26 patients, 468 dialysis sessions, compared blood pressure, heart rate, incidence of hypotension and the frequency of corrections required with saline or hypertonic glucose infusions.

Results. The results of intradialytic haemodynamic monitoring for modalities A and B, respectively, were: lowest systolic blood pressure 120.8±20.8 vs 124.3±20.6 mmHg (P < 0.01); mean systolic blood pressure 138.5±23.8 vs 144.6±24.8 mmHg (P < 0.001); and highest heart rate 73.5±12.0 vs 75.8 ± 12.9 (NS); with modality A, patients had more dialysis sessions with hypotensive episodes (5.55 vs 1.7%, P < 0.05) and required more saline or hypertonic glucose infusions (20.9 vs 13.7% of the dialysis sessions, P < 0.05).

Conclusions. Mild metabolic alkalosis resulting from standard bicarbonate haemodialysis (32 mmol/l) may induce symptomatic hypotension. While normalizing chronic metabolic acidosis is desirable, reducing bicarbonate concentrations should be considered in cases of significant alkalaemia or otherwise untreatable haemodynamic instability.

Keywords: alkalosis; bicarbonate; haemodialysis; haemodynamics; hypotension


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. Gabutti, G. Bianchi, D. Soldini, C. Marone, and M. Burnier
Haemodynamic consequences of changing bicarbonate and calcium concentrations in haemodialysis fluids
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2009; 24(3): 973 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.