Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vecchi, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Montalto, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vecchi, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Montalto, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 2321-2324
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Original Article

Prevalence of biliary lithiasis in a Sicilian population of chronic renal failure patients

Maurizio Li Vecchi1, Maurizio Soresi2, Rosa Cusimano1, Antonio Carroccio2, Ciro Corrado1, Adriana Gioe’1 and Giuseppe Montalto2

1Cattedra di Nefrologia and 2Cattedra di Medicina Interna, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Malattie Cardiovascolari e Nefro-Urologiche, Palermo, Italy

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Giuseppe Montalto, Cattedra di Medicina Interna, 141 Via del Vespro, 90127 Palermo, Italy. Email: gmontal{at}unipa.it

Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of biliary lithiasis (BL) and associated risk factors in a population of undialysed patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), and to compare these with findings we had obtained previously in chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients and in subjects from the general population located in the same geographic region.

Methods. A toal of 118 CRF patients on conservative treatment were included in the study. In all subjects, we measured several clinical and humoral parameters potentially correlated with BL. Liver and biliary tract ultrasonography was performed with a 3.5 MHz linear probe after at least 12 h of fasting.

Results. The prevalence of BL in CRF patients was 22%, which was higher than in the general population ({chi}2 = 9.4, P < 0.002) but lower than in HD patients ({chi}2 = 25.9, P < 0.0001). Age was similar in the three groups. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the CRF group than in both HD patients (P < 0.0001) and the general population (P < 0.0001). When the CRF group was divided into subjects with or without BL, the only difference was lower serum calcium levels in the subgroup with BL (P < 0.04).

Conclusions. The prevalence of BL in a Sicilian population of CRF patients was higher than in the general population, but lower than in patients with CRF on chronic HD. Apart from BMI, none of the risk factors traditionally associated with BL in the general population were related to BL in the CRF patients. These data suggest that other factors inherent to kidney pathology contribute to the high prevalence of BL in CRF patients.

Keywords: biliary lithiasis; chronic renal failure; epidemiology; risk factors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
H. Lu and C. Klaassen
Gender Differences in mRNA Expression of ATP-Binding Cassette Efflux and Bile Acid Transporters in Kidney, Liver, and Intestine of 5/6 Nephrectomized Rats
Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 16 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.