Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gok, F.
Right arrow Articles by Topaloglu, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gok, F.
Right arrow Articles by Topaloglu, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 2278-2283
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Original Article

Mutational analysis of the xanthine dehydrogenase gene in a Turkish family with autosomal recessive classical xanthinuria

Faysal Gok1, Kimiyoshi Ichida2 and Rezan Topaloglu3

1Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Gulhane Military Medical School, 3Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey and 2Division of Kidney and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishishimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Rezan Topaloglu, MD, Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara 06100, Turkey. Email: rtopalog{at}hacettepe.edu.tr

Background. Classical xanthinuria is classified into two categories: type I, deficient only in xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH) activity; and type II, deficient in both XDH and aldehyde oxidase. Both types present mainly with renal stones and lead to renal failure in some cases. We studied the molecular basis of xanthinuria in a Turkish family with two affected siblings.

Methods. We examined two brothers aged 1 and 14 years who presented with histories of passing several urinary stones. We measured their serum and urine levels of uric acid and oxypurine, chemically analysed their stones and performed allopurinol loading tests to diagnose the type of xanthinuria. In addition, we studied the coding regions of the XDH gene in family members.

Results. In the siblings, serum uric acid was undetectable and serum oxypurine was elevated. Laboratory studies showed that the stones that they passed were composed of xanthine, and both were diagnosed as having classical xanthinuria. The allopurinol loading tests indicated their xanthinuria to be type I. Within the entire coding region of the XDH gene, an A to T base change at nucleotide position 2164 was identified in the siblings, indicating a nonsense substitution from AAG (Lys) to TAG (Tyr) at codon 722. Concerning this novel nonsense mutation, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis showed that the brothers were both homozygous, while the parents were heterozygous, and this confirmed the autosomal recessive inheritance of the XDH gene mutation.

Conclusions. In a Turkish family, we identified a novel point mutation in the XDH gene responsible for classical type I xanthinuria. That both parents had a history of passing renal stones in spite of being heterozygous for that mutation may indicate that individuals with a heterozygous nonsense XDH mutation are more susceptible to nephrolithiasis than healthy individuals. This raises the point that individuals with a heterozygous XDH mutation may also present with renal stones.

Keywords: aldehyde oxidase; hypouricaemia; molybdenum cofactor; urolithiasis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.