Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lufft, V.
Right arrow Articles by Brunkhorst, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lufft, V.
Right arrow Articles by Brunkhorst, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 2141-2146
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Original Article

Kidney transplantation in children: impact of young recipient age on graft survival

Volkmar Lufft1,2, Günter Tusch3, Gisela Offner4 and Reinhard Brunkhorst5,6

1Abtelilung Nephrologie, Zentrum Innere Medizin und Dermatologie, 3Klinik für Abdominal- und Transplantationschirurgie, 4Zentrum für Kinderheilkunde and 5Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Reinhard Brunkhorst, Klinik für Nieren-, Hochdruck- und Gefäßkrankheiten, Klinikum Hannover Oststadt, Podbielskistrasse 380, D-30659 Hannover, Germany. Email: sekretariat.brunkhorst.oststadt{at}klinikum-hannover.de

Background. It has been suggested that recipient age may have an effect on renal graft survival due to its potential influence on the competence of the immune system. A comparison of graft survival between children and elderly adults, however, has never been performed.

Methods. Forty patients <=18 years old were included in the study group and compared with a control group of patients >=65 years using a case–control analysis. Apart from age, matching criteria were the number of HLA mismatches and the date of transplantation.

Results. The mean age differed by 57 years between study and control group (10 ± 5 vs 67 ± 2, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the number of initially non-functioning grafts, sex distribution, immunosuppression, number of HLA mismatches on the HLA-DR, -B and -A locus, cold ischaemia time and the number of patients with panel-reactive antibodies. The only difference was a lower donor age in the study group (17 ± 14 vs 35 ± 16, P < 0.001) compared with the control group. During the follow-up of 109 ± 54 and 79 ± 49 months, respectively, acute rejections were more frequent in the study group (25 vs 12, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in graft survival between both groups when death with functioning graft was excluded.

Conclusions. This study which compares two groups of patients with a mean age difference of 57 years could not demonstrate an effect of young recipient age on graft survival, though the incidence of acute rejections appeared to be significantly higher in the paediatric population. Thus paediatric renal transplanted patients do not seem to have a disadvantage regarding graft survival due to their young recipient age.

Keywords: acute rejection; cold ischaemia time; graft survival; HLA matching; kidney transplantation; recipient age

2Present address: Nephrologisches Zentrum Rendsburg-Eckernförde, Germany.

6Present address: Klinik für Nieren-, Hochdruck- und Gefäßkrankheiten, Klinikum Hannover Oststadt, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
W. Harmon, K. Meyers, J. Ingelfinger, R. McDonald, M. McIntosh, M. Ho, L. Spaneas, J. A. Palmer, M. Hawk, C. Geehan, et al.
Safety and Efficacy of a Calcineurin Inhibitor Avoidance Regimen in Pediatric Renal Transplantation
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2006; 17(6): 1735 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.