Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Hermerén, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Hermerén, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 1497-1502
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Kidneys from marginal donors: views of patients on informed consent

Marie Omnell Persson1,, Nils H. Persson1, Ragnar Källén1, Henrik Ekberg1 and Göran Hermerén2

1 Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, SE-205 02 Malmö and 2 Department of Medical Ethics, St Gra°brödersgatan 16, Lund University, SE-222 22 Lund, Sweden

Background. Considering the fact that donor age is a major risk factor for graft survival, and taking into account the importance attached to the principle of autonomy in the Swedish Health Care Law, we decided that allocation of kidneys from marginal donors should be restricted to patients who have given their informed consent. Written information was given to the patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation in the southern part of Sweden. Patients were asked to state whether they would accept either a single kidney or dual transplantation kidneys from marginal donors. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of patients on the information they received about kidneys from marginal donors and their reaction to being asked to make a decision on this issue.

Methods. A questionnaire was posted to 61 patients who had already replied to the question of whether or not they would accept kidneys from a marginal donor for themselves. The median age of the patients was 52 years (range 22–74 years). Answers were given anonymously.

Results. Among the 53 respondents, 48 considered the information to be comprehensible. The extent of the information was considered sufficient by 43 patients. No patient thought that the information was too extensive. According to 41 patients, it is totally right to be asked to make a decision on this type of issue. Two patients thought it was totally wrong. Finally, 33 patients thought it was easy to make a decision on this issue.

Conclusions. This study indicates that patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation accept information on donor-related risk factors and most patients want to be involved in the decision concerning transplantation with a kidney from a marginal donor.

Keywords: decision-making; informed consent; kidney transplantation; marginal donor

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Marie Omnell Persson, Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden. Email: marie.omnell\|[hyphen]\|persson{at}kir.mas.lu.se


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. M. Merion, V. B. Ashby, R. A. Wolfe, D. A. Distant, T. E. Hulbert-Shearon, R. A. Metzger, A. O. Ojo, and F. K. Port
Deceased-Donor Characteristics and the Survival Benefit of Kidney Transplantation
JAMA, December 7, 2005; 294(21): 2726 - 2733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.