Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moret, K.
Right arrow Articles by Leunissen, K. M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moret, K.
Right arrow Articles by Leunissen, K. M. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 1463-1469
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Ionic mass balance and blood volume preservation during a high, standard, and individualized dialysate sodium concentration

Karin Moret, Daxenos Hassell1, Jeroen P. Kooman1,, Frank van der Sande1, Paul G. G. Gerlag, A. Warmold L. van den Wall Bake, Jarno van de Bogaart and Karel M. L. Leunissen1

St Joseph Hospital, Veldhoven and 1 University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Background. Although a higher dialysate sodium concentration (DNa) is frequently used to improve haemodynamic stability during haemodialysis, few studies have compared ionic mass balance (IMB) during different DNa. Moreover, DNa is usually a standard prescription, whereas inter-individual pre-dialytic serum sodium levels may differ widely. The aims of the study were to assess IMB and the decline in blood volume ({Delta}BV) during isovolaemic HD as well as during HD combined with ultrafiltration (UF) during DNa [140], DNa [144], and an individualized DNa [ind], in which DNa is equal to pre-HD plasma conductivityx10.

Methods. IMB and plasma conductivity were assessed by on-line conductivity measurements (Diascan®; Hospal®) in 13 HD patients. After 1 h of isovolaemic HD, measurements were continued during UF+HD until dry weight. {Delta}BV was assessed by an optical method (Hemoscan®).

Results. During isovolaemic HD with DNa [140] and [144], Pre-Na was significantly related to IMB (r=0.83 and r=0.61; P<0.05). Diffusive Na flux into the patient occurred when the difference between DNa and pre-dialytic serum sodium was larger than 5 mmol/l. During UF+HD, IMB was 318±166 mmol during DNa [140], 277±116 mmol during DNa [ind], and 239±111 during DNa [144] (mean±SD; P<0.05 compared with the other treatment modalities) whereas {Delta}BV did not differ significantly. In the five patients with a pre-dialytic sodium concentration below 140 mmol/l, ionic removal was significantly higher during DNa [ind] (324±87) compared with DNa [140] (228±127 mmol; P<0.05) without a significant difference in {Delta}BV (-9.7±1.6 vs -7.8±2.3%).

Conclusion. A large difference in IMB was observed between DNa 144 and DNa 140, without a significant difference in {Delta}BV. In patients with low pre-dialytic serum sodium levels, diffusive ionic influx from the dialysate into the patient may occur. In patients with low pre-dialytic sodium levels, DNa [ind] leads to an enhanced ionic removal compared with DNa [140] without large differences in {Delta}BV.

Keywords: blood volume; dialysate sodium concentration; ionic mass balance; haemodialysis; ultrafiltration

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Jeroen P. Kooman, MD PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. Email: jkoo{at}sint.azm


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
K. Moret, D. C. Grootendorst, C. Beerenhout, and J. P. Kooman
Conductivity pulses needed for Diascan(R) measurements: does it cause sodium burden?
NDT Plus, August 1, 2009; 2(4): 334 - 335.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
L. Mercadal, A. Servais, M. Venditto, N. Renault, C. Isnard-Bagnis, G. Deray, and T. Petitclerc
Measuring Plasma Conductivity to Detect Sodium Load in Hemodialysis Patients
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 743 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
S. F. F. Santos and A. J. Peixoto
Revisiting the Dialysate Sodium Prescription as a Tool for Better Blood Pressure and Interdialytic Weight Gain Management in Hemodialysis Patients
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 522 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. Moret, J. Aalten, W. van den Wall Bake, P. Gerlag, C. Beerenhout, F. van der Sande, K. Leunissen, and J. Kooman
The effect of sodium profiling and feedback technologies on plasma conductivity and ionic mass balance: a study in hypotension-prone dialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 138 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. Chesterton, S. H. Lambie, L. J. Hulme, M. Taal, R. J. Fluck, and C. W. McIntyre
Online measurement of haemoglobin concentration
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 1951 - 1955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
J. H. Song, G. H. Park, S. Y. Lee, S. W. Lee, S. W. Lee, and M.-J. Kim
Effect of Sodium Balance and the Combination of Ultrafiltration Profile during Sodium Profiling Hemodialysis on the Maintenance of the Quality of Dialysis and Sodium and Fluid Balances
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 237 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. P. Kooman, F. M. van der Sande, and K. M. L. Leunissen
Sodium, blood pressure and cardiovascular pathology: is it all volaemia?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1046 - 1049.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.