Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jassal, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Mendelssohn, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jassal, S. V.
Right arrow Articles by Mendelssohn, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 474-477
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Attitudes of British Isles nephrologists towards dialysis modality selection: a questionnaire study

Sarbjit Vanita Jassal1,2,, Ganesh Krishna2, Netar P. Mallick3 and David C. Mendelssohn1

1 Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK and 3 Department of Nephrology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Background. Dialysis demographics are changing around the world. Within the UK a striking decrease in the overall use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been noted. We set out to determine the opinions and attitudes of British Isles nephrologists about dialysis modality decisions and optimal dialysis system design.

Methods. A survey questionnaire was mailed to a random selection of members of the Renal Association of Great Britain and Ireland.

Results. A 63% response rate was achieved. Decisions about dialysis modality were based mostly on patient preference (mean score 4.4 on a scale of 1–5), quality of life data (mean score 3.8), and morbidity and mortality data (mean scores for both 3.6). The least important factors when choosing the modality of dialysis care were the treatment costs to either the patient or the health care system. Respondents felt that both PD and hospital-based haemodialysis (HD) were over-utilized in today's practice. They suggested that an ‘ideal dialysis system’ (based on patient survival, wellness, and quality of life) should have 27% of patients dialysed using hospital-based HD, 24% in a satellite unit, 11% dialysed using home HD, and 38% on some form of PD (19, 16, and 3% for CAPD, automated PD and intermittent PD, respectively). Few differences were identified between an ideal system which optimized patient survival, wellness, and quality of life, compared with one which optimized cost-effectiveness.

Conclusion. This survey suggests that most nephrologists in the British Isles feel that hospital-based HD and CAPD are being currently overused, and that future dialysis planning should include a higher proportion of patients on satellite dialysis, home HD, and automated PD to optimize both dialysis cost-effectiveness and patient outcomes.

Keywords: haemodialysis; modality; selection peritoneal dialysis

Correspondence and offprint requests: Dr S. V. Jassal, University Health Network, 225-11EN, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, M5G 2C4, Ontario, Canada. Email: vanita.jassal{at}uhn.on.ca


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. Bouvier, P.-Y. Durand, A. Testa, C. Albert, V. Planquois, J.-P. Ryckelynck, and T. Lobbedez
Regional discrepancies in peritoneal dialysis utilization in France: the role of the nephrologist's opinion about peritoneal dialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 1293 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Lee, C. Gudex, J. V. Povlsen, B. Bonnevie, and C. P. Nielsen
Patients' views regarding choice of dialysis modality
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 3953 - 3959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. M. Just, F. Th. de Charro, E. A. Tschosik, L. L. Noe, S. K. Bhattacharyya, and M. C. Riella
Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2365 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. Baboolal, P. McEwan, S. Sondhi, P. Spiewanowski, J. Wechowski, and K. Wilson
The cost of renal dialysis in a UK setting--a multicentre study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1982 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. v. Biesen, N. Veys, N. Lameire, and R. Vanholder
Why less success of the peritoneal dialysis programmes in Europe?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1478 - 1481.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Lambie, H. C. Rayner, J. L. Bragg-Gresham, R. L. Pisoni, V. E. Andreucci, B. Canaud, F. K. Port, and E. W. Young
Starting and withdrawing haemodialysis--associations between nephrologists' opinions, patient characteristics and practice patterns (data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study)
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2814 - 2820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. S. MacGregor, J. W. M. Agar, and C. R. Blagg
Home haemodialysis--international trends and variation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1934 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Goovaerts, M. Jadoul, and E. Goffin
Influence of a Pre-Dialysis Education Programme (PDEP) on the mode of renal replacement therapy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 1842 - 1847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.