Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griva, K.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griva, K.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, S. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 2204-2211
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Quality of life and emotional responses in cadaver and living related renal transplant recipients

Konstadina Griva, Jochen P. Ziegelmann, Derek Thompson, Dakshina Jayasena, Andrew Davenport, Michael Harrison and Stanton P. Newman

Unit of Health Psychology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University College London, London, UK

Background. The specific impact of transplantation on living related donor (LRD) and cadaver (CAD) kidney transplant recipients and their health-related quality of life (HQoL) has received little attention. This study examined the role of sociodemographic, medical and psychological factors in these two groups.

Methods. A total of 347 transplant recipients (76 LRD and 271 CAD patients) completed the Short Form 36 Health Survey and Transplant Effects Questionnaire.

Results. Overall, transplant patients showed satisfactory HQoL particularly with respect to emotional well being. HQoL levels were found to be equivalent in both transplant groups. ANCOVAs showed that LRD recipients expressed more guilt in relation to the donor (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that worry about the viability and functioning of the transplant alone predicted 15.1% of the variance in the SF-36 mental composite score (MCS) whereas age, income, comorbidities and time on dialysis explained 37.8% of the variance in the SF-36 physical composite score (PCS). Multiple regression analyses performed separately for LRD and CAD patients showed that predictors of MCS and PCS between the two groups were similar.

Conclusions. Our results indicate that different forms of transplantation (LRD vs CAD) may lead to different emotional responses albeit with no apparent quality of life differences. In particular, feelings of guilt appear to be prominent in LRD transplantation.

Keywords: cadaver; living related donor; psychological factors; quality of life; renal transplantation

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Stanton P. Newman, Unit of Health Psychology, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University College London, Wolfson Building, 48 Riding House Street, London W1N 8AA, UK. Email: s.newman{at}ucl.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. Aasebo, N. A. Homb-Vesteraas, A. Hartmann, and K. Stavem
Life situation and quality of life in young adult kidney transplant recipients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 304 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Rosenberger, J. P. van Dijk, I. Nagyova, R. Roland, A. M. Geckova, W. J. A. van den Heuvel, and J. W. Groothoff
Do dialysis- and transplantation-related medical factors affect perceived health status?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2153 - 2158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.