Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (46)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hollett, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hollett, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2002) 17: 1802-1807
© 2002 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

A randomized controlled trial of topical exit site mupirocin application in patients with tunnelled, cuffed haemodialysis catheters

David Wayne Johnson, Robert MacGinley, Troy David Kay, Carmel Mary Hawley, Scott Bryan Campbell, Nicole Maree Isbel and Peter Hollett

Department of Renal Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

Background. Central venous catheters are frequently needed for the provision of haemodialysis, but their clinical usefulness is severely limited by infectious complications. The risk of such infections can be reduced by topical application of mupirocin to the exit sites of non-cuffed catheters or by the use of tunnelled, cuffed catheters. Whether mupirocin offers any additional protection against infection in patients with tunnelled, cuffed haemodialysis catheters has not been studied.

Methods. An open-label, randomized controlled trial was performed comparing the effect of thrice-weekly exit site application of mupirocin (mupirocin group) vs no ointment (control group) on infection rates and catheter survival in patients receiving haemodialysis via a newly inserted, tunnelled, cuffed central venous catheter. All patients were followed until catheter removal and were monitored for the development of exit site infections and catheter-associated bacteraemias.

Results. Fifty patients were enrolled in the study. Both the mupirocin (n=27) and control (n=23) groups were similar at baseline with respect to demographic characteristics, comorbid illnesses and causes of renal failure. Compared with controls, mupirocin-treated patients experienced significantly fewer catheter-related bacteraemias (7 vs 35%, P<0.01) and a longer time to first bacteraemia (log rank score 8.68, P<0.01). The beneficial effect of mupirocin was entirely attributable to a reduction in staphylococcal infection (log rank 10.69, P=0.001) and was still observed when only patients without prior nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage were included in the analysis (log rank score 6.33, P=0.01). Median catheter survival was also significantly longer in the mupirocin group (108 vs 31 days, log rank score 5.9, P<0.05). Mupirocin use was not associated with any adverse patient effects or the induction of antimicrobial resistance.

Conclusions. Thrice-weekly application of mupirocin to tunnelled, cuffed haemodialysis catheter exit sites is associated with a marked reduction in line-related sepsis and a prolongation of catheter survival.

Keywords: antibiotics therapeutic use; bacteraemia; catheterization, central venous; dialysis; equipment contamination; staphylococcal infections

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Associate Professor David W. Johnson, Department of Renal Medicine, Level 2, Ambulatory Renal and Transplant Services Building, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane Qld 4102, Australia. Email: david_johnson{at}health.qld.gov.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. S. Rabindranath, T. Bansal, J. Adams, R. Das, R. Shail, A. M. MacLeod, C. Moore, and A. Besarab
Systematic review of antimicrobials for the prevention of haemodialysis catheter-related infections
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3763 - 3774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
S. J. Vandecasteele, J. R. Boelaert, and A. S. De Vriese
Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Hemodialysis: What a Nephrologist Should Know
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2009; 4(8): 1388 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Steczko, S. R. Ash, D. E. Nivens, L. Brewer, and R. K. Winger
Microbial inactivation properties of a new antimicrobial/antithrombotic catheter lock solution (citrate/methylene blue/parabens)
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1937 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Winnett, J. Nolan, M. Miller, and N. Ashman
Trisodium citrate 46.7% selectively and safely reduces staphylococcal catheter-related bacteraemia
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 3592 - 3598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. Labriola, R. Crott, and M. Jadoul
Preventing haemodialysis catheter-related bacteraemia with an antimicrobial lock solution: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1666 - 1672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. T. James, J. Conley, M. Tonelli, B. J. Manns, J. MacRae, B. R. Hemmelgarn, and for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network
Meta-analysis: Antibiotics for Prophylaxis against Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Infections
Ann Intern Med, April 15, 2008; 148(8): 596 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
M. Allon
Current Management of Vascular Access
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2007; 2(4): 786 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. W. Johnson, C. van Eps, D. W. Mudge, K. J. Wiggins, K. Armstrong, C. M. Hawley, S. B. Campbell, N. M. Isbel, G. R. Nimmo, and H. Gibbs
Randomized, Controlled Trial of Topical Exit-Site Application of Honey (Medihoney) versus Mupirocin for the Prevention of Catheter-Associated Infections in Hemodialysis Patients
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2005; 16(5): 1456 - 1462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. N. Foley, H. Guo, J. J. Snyder, D. T. Gilbertson, and A. J. Collins
Septicemia in the United States Dialysis Population, 1991 to 1999
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2004; 15(4): 1038 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
H. F.L. Wertheim, M. C. Vos, A. Ott, A. Voss, J. A.J.W. Kluytmans, C. M.J.E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, M. H.M. Meester, P. H.J. van Keulen, and H. A. Verbrugh
Mupirocin Prophylaxis against Nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Nonsurgical Patients: A Randomized Study
Ann Intern Med, March 16, 2004; 140(6): 419 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Ponikvar
Blood purification in the intensive care unit
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2003; 18(90005): v63 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.