Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staatz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tett, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Staatz, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tett, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 1905-1909
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Low tacrolimus concentrations and increased risk of early acute rejection in adult renal transplantation

Christine Staatz1, Paul Taylor2,3 and Susan Tett1,

1 School of Pharmacy, 2 Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, and 3 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Background. A retrospective analysis was performed on adult renal transplant recipients to evaluate the relationship between tacrolimus trough concentrations and the development of rejection in the first month after transplant.

Methods. A total of 349 concentrations from 29 patients, measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), were recorded. Based on an increased serum creatinine, 12 patients were considered to have organ rejection. Rejection was confirmed by biopsy in five of these. The median trough concentration of tacrolimus over the first month of therapy, or until the time of first rejection was compared in rejecters vs non-rejecters.

Results. Median trough concentrations of tacrolimus were found to be lower in biopsy-proven rejecters vs non-rejecters (P=0.03) and all rejecters vs non-rejecters (P=0.04). The average median concentration (±SD) in the biopsy-proven rejecter group was 5.09±1.16 ng/ml, compared to 9.20±3.52 ng/ml in the non-rejecter group. After exclusion of an outlier, the average median concentration in all rejecters was 5.57±1.47 ng/ml, compared with 9.20±3.52 ng/ml in non-rejecters. A rejection rate of 55% was found for patients with a median trough concentration between 0 and 10 ng/ml. This compared with no observed rejection in patients with a median concentration between 10 and 15 ng/ml.

Conclusion. A significant relationship exists between organ rejection and median tacrolimus trough concentrations in the first month post-transplant, with patients displaying low concentrations more likely to reject. In order to minimize rejection in the first month after renal transplantation, trough concentrations greater than 10 ng/ml must be achieved.

Keywords: adult renal transplant; concentration; biopsy-proven rejection; pharmacodynamics; tacrolimus; therapeutic drug monitoring

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Susan Tett, School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
R. Borrows, G. Chusney, M. Loucaidou, A. James, S. Goel, S. Borrows, J. Van Tromp, T. Cairns, M. Griffith, N. Hakim, et al.
Analysis of Factors Influencing Tacrolimus Levels and Immunoassay Bias in Renal Transplantation
J. Clin. Pharmacol., August 1, 2007; 47(8): 1035 - 1042.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.