Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patil, U. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ballal, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patil, U. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ballal, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 1900-1904
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Helical CT angiography in evaluation of live kidney donors

Uday D. Patil1, Ashok Ragavan1, Nadaraj1, Keshava Murthy1, Ravi Shankar1, Bahar Bastani2, and Sudarshan H. Ballal1

Divisions of Nephrology and Radiology at 1 Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India, and 2 Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Missouri, USA

Background. Live kidney donor evaluation mandates anatomical and functional assessment of the donor kidney. Helical computed tomography (CT) with advanced 3-D techniques provides detailed description of the vascular, parenchymal, and collecting system.

Methods. We compared the accuracy of helical CT angiography with intra-operative findings in the evaluation of 102 live kidney donors.

Results. Identification of vascular anomalies was best on direct viewing of the axial images using interactive scrolling through the images and cine-loop paging. In 204 kidneys evaluated, a single renal artery was present in 74.5% and a single renal vein in 87.5%. Multiple renal arteries were more common on the left side (31%) vs the right side (20%). Early branching of the arteries was seen with equal frequency ({approx}10%) on either side. Multiple renal veins were more often on the right side (20%) vs the left side (5%), and one patient was found to have double inferior vena cava. CT angiographic findings were concordant with the intra-operative findings in 97% of the cases, missing a small renal vein, an accessory artery that was visualized in retrospect, and a very early branch that was read as accessory artery. CT also revealed cortical cysts (four cases), duplex collecting system (two cases), hydronephrosis (one case), renal stone (one case), and liver haemangioma (two cases).

Conclusion. CT angiography is highly accurate for detecting vascular anomalies, and providing anatomical information. It may serve as the primary tool for donor evaluation.

Keywords: donor evaluation; helical CT scan; renal angiography; transplantation

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Bahar Bastani MD, Professor of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. K. Singh, D. V. Sahani, C. R. Kagay, S. P. Kalva, M. C. Joshi, N. Elias, and T. Kawai
Semiautomated MIP Images Created Directly on 16-Section Multidetector CT Console for Evaluation of Living Renal Donors
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 583 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Raman, S. Pojchamarnwiputh, K. Muangsomboon, P. G. Schulam, H. A. Gritsch, and D. S. K. Lu
Surgically Relevant Normal and Variant Renal Parenchymal and Vascular Anatomy in Preoperative 16-MDCT Evaluation of Potential Laparoscopic Renal Donors
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 105 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Raman, S. Pojchamarnwiputh, K. Muangsomboon, P. G. Schulam, H. A. Gritsch, and D. S. K. Lu
Utility of 16-MDCT angiography for comprehensive preoperative vascular evaluation of laparoscopic renal donors.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1630 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Holden, A. Smith, P. Dukes, H. Pilmore, and M. Yasutomi
Assessment of 100 Live Potential Renal Donors for Laparoscopic Nephrectomy with Multi-Detector Row Helical CT
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 973 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. V. Sahani, N. Rastogi, A. C. Greenfield, S. P. Kalva, D. Ko, S. Saini, G. Harris, and P. R. Mueller
Multi-Detector Row CT in Evaluation of 94 Living Renal Donors by Readers with Varied Experience
Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 905 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Kawamoto, L. P. Lawler, and E. K. Fishman
Evaluation of the Renal Venous System on Late Arterial and Venous Phase Images with MDCT Angiography in Potential Living Laparoscopic Renal Donors
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 539 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Kawamoto, R. A. Montgomery, L. P. Lawler, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman
Multi-Detector Row CT Evaluation of Living Renal Donors Prior to Laparoscopic Nephrectomy
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2004; 24(2): 453 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Kawamoto, R. A. Montgomery, L. P. Lawler, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman
Multidetector CT Angiography for Preoperative Evaluation of Living Laparoscopic Kidney Donors
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1633 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Tang, T. M. Chan, and K. N. Lai
Kidney donor evaluation with helical CT angiography
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 533 - 534.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.