Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castro, M. C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Marcondes, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castro, M. C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Marcondes, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 1814-1817
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Measurement of blood urea concentration during haemodialysis is not an accurate method to determine equilibrated post-dialysis urea concentration

Editor's note Please see also Editorial comment by Kooman et al. pp. 1749–1752.

Manuel Carlos Martins Castro, João Egidio Romão, Jr and Marcello Marcondes

Division of Nephrology, Hospital das Clínicas of the School of Medicine of São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil

Background. The double-pool urea kinetic model requires the measurement of the blood urea concentrations 30 min after haemodialysis (Ct+30) to calculate equilibrated Kt/V. However, it has been suggested that urea concentrations 30 min before the end of dialysis (Ct-30) may be representative of Ct+30. The aim of this study was to validate this suggestion.

Methods. Twenty-two patients underwent haemodialysis for 180, 210, and 240 min. For each patient in each dialysis session, urea exponential decay curve was calculated. Because we measured Ct+30, we calculated the time (Tc) before the end of dialysis that blood urea concentrations would be the same as Ct+30. In an additional 33 patients, we measured blood urea concentrations at Tc and in Ct+30.

Results. We found that Ct-30 was significantly lower than Ct+30 independent of the duration of dialysis. However, there was a significant correlation between Kt/Vt-30 and Kt/Vt+30. The Tc was 45 min before the end of dialysis. In the additional 33 patients, Ct-45 and Ct+30 were 54±17 and 52±17 mg/dl (NS), and Kt/Vt-45 and Kt/Vt+30 were 1.27±0.21 and 1.29±0.18 (NS), respectively. There were significant correlations between Ct-45 and Ct+30 (r=0.96; P<0.001), and between Kt/Vt-45 and Kt/Vt+30 (r=0.82; P<0.001). However, when measurements were analysed individually, 48% of the data points from Ct-45 vs Ct+30, and 42% of the data points from Kt/Vt-45 vs Kt/Vt+30 fell out of the 95% confidence interval of regression line.

Conclusions. Although Ct-45 is useful to estimate Kt/V when assessing mean values, it is not suitable when assessing patients individually. This study demonstrates that the best method to calculate equilibrated Kt/V was a blood sample for urea concentrations 30 min after haemodialysis.

Keywords: equilibrated Kt/V; haemodialysis; intradialytic blood urea concentration; post-dialysis blood urea concentration; urea rebound

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Manuel Carlos Martins Castro, Rua Inhambu, 1069 Apto 72, CEP: 04520-013 São Paulo, Brazil.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. P. Kooman, F. M. van der Sande, and K. M. L. Leunissen
Kt/V: finding the tree within the woods
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1749 - 1752.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.