Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 1536-1538
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association
Editorial Comments
The evidence base for the treatment of lupus nephritis in the new millennium
Department of Nephrology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
Keywords: lupus nephritis
Introduction
At the start of the new millennium, it is important to reassess progress in the treatment of lupus nephritis. The aims of treating lupus nephritis are to induce and maintain remission thereby reducing the risks of progression to renal failure and of dying. At the same time, patients with lupus nephritis may have extra-renal disease, the most severe of which is central nervous system disease and this requires treatment. A further and important aim is to minimize treatment-related toxicity. Prednisolone and cyclophosphamide are accepted as the optimal treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis [1] but have substantial toxicities. What then is the evidence base for the treatment of lupus nephritis and why does the treatment of lupus nephritis still generate such strong differences of opinion?
Steroids plus alkylating agents or azathioprine
Patients with mesangial proliferation
Plasma exchange
New treatment
MMF and lupus nephritis
Randomized controlled trials of MMF
Conclusion
Notes
References
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M J Lewis and D D'Cruz Adhesion molecules, mycophenolate mofetil and systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus, March 1, 2005; 14(3_suppl): s17 - s26. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lewis and D. D'Cruz Adhesion molecules, mycophenolate mofetil and systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus, January 1, 2005; 14(1_suppl): s17 - s26. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. N. Wardle and D. Adu Lupus nephritis in the new millennium Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 519 - 519. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Ghosh Lupus nephritis: physicians' preparedness for communication of evidence-based therapy Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 525 - 526. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

