Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira, A.
Right arrow Articles by Drüeke, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira, A.
Right arrow Articles by Drüeke, T. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 1230-1238
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Effect of type of dialysis membrane on bone in haemodialysis patients

Anibal Ferreira1, Abderhaman Ghazali2, José Galvão3, Jean-Claude Souberbielle4, Peter M. Jehle5, Subburaman Mohan6, Béatrice Descamps-Latscha7, Roxana Oprisiu2, Albert Fournier2 and Tilman B. Drüeke7,

1 Hospital Curry Cabral, Lisbon, Portugal, 2 Service de Néphrologie et de Médecine Interne, CHU, Amiens, France, 3 Hospital Militar Principal, Lisbon, Portugal, 4 Laboratoire de Physiologie, Faculté de Médecine Necker, Paris, France, 5 Division of Nephrology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany, 6 Musculoskeletal Diseases Center (151), Jerry L. Pettis VA Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA and 7 INSERM U 507, Division of Nephrology, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France

Background. Uraemic bone disease is the result of a number of factors modulating bone formation and resorption in a complex manner. In the present study, the hypothesis tested was that the type of haemodialysis membrane used for renal replacement therapy might also play a role.

Methods. We conducted a prospective, open study in 24 chronic haemodialysis patients who were randomized to dialysis treatment with either cellulosic (CELL group, n=11) or polyacrylonitrile (AN-69 group, n=13) membrane for 9 months. Repeated determinations of plasma parameters reflecting bone turnover were done in all patients, and a bone biopsy in a subgroup at the start and end of study.

Results. At the start, mean plasma intact parathyroid hormone levels were comparable between the two groups and they did not vary significantly at 9 months of treatment. Similarly, plasma bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin (markers of bone formation), and cross-laps (marker of bone resorption) remained unchanged. However, plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) progressively decreased from 169 to 119 ng/ml in AN-69 group (P<0.01), whereas it remained unchanged in CELL group. In addition, the levels of IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 and IGFBP-2 were increased while the levels of IGFBP-5 were decreased in AN-69 group. In the five patients of each group who had repeat bone biopsies, histomorphometric analysis showed a decrease in osteoblast surface, osteoclast surface and osteoclast number in AN-69 group at 9 months, compared with baseline values measured at the start of the study. In contrast, all three parameters significantly increased in the CELL group at 9 months (P<0.001 for the difference between each of the three parameters).Bone formation rate decreased by 31% in the AN-69 group, but increased by 50% in CELL group. However, this latter difference was not statistically significant. Plasma interleukin (IL)-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor levels did not change in the two groups of patients who had undergone bone biopsy.

Conclusion. Dialysis with CELL membrane was associated with increased bone turnover whereas the use of AN-69 membrane was associated with decreased bone turnover, suggesting a beneficial effect of the latter on high-turnover uraemic bone disease. However, as the number of patients with repeat bone biopsies was small, these findings need to be confirmed in a larger study. Further studies are also needed to evaluate whether or not the changes in IGF system components play a role in decreased bone cell activity in patients on dialysis using the AN-69 polyacrylonitrile membrane.

Keywords: renal osteodystrophy; haemodialysis; membrane; bone markers; bone biopsy

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Tilman B. Drüeke, MD, INSERM Unité 507 and Division of Nephrology, Hôpital Necker, 161 rue de Sèvres, F-75743 Paris Cedex 15, France.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Gil, C. Lucas, C. Possante, C. Jorge, F. Gomes, M. Candeias, H. Lages, E. Arranhado, and A. Ferreira
On-line haemodiafiltration decreases serum TNF{alpha} levels in haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 447 - 448.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.