Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krause, I.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenstein, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krause, I.
Right arrow Articles by Eisenstein, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 1203-1206
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Inferior vena cava diameter: a useful method for estimation of fluid status in children on haemodialysis

Irit Krause1,, Einat Birk2, Miriam Davidovits1, Roxana Cleper1, Leonard Blieden2, Lidya Pinhas2, Zahava Gamzo1 and Bella Eisenstein1

1 Nephrology Clinic and Dialysis Unit, 2 Institute of Cardiology, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel

Background. An accurate assessment of fluid status in haemodialysis patients presents a significant challenge especially in growing children. Clinical parameters of hydration are not always reliable, and invasive methods such as measurement of central venous pressure cannot be used routinely. We evaluated the usefulness of inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) measured by echocardiography in the estimation of hydration in children on haemodialysis.

Methods. Fifteen haemodialysis patients (mean age 14 years) were evaluated. Clinical assessment included patients’ symptoms, weight, blood pressure, heart rate, presence of oedema and vascular congestion, before and after dialysis session. Dry weight was assessed based on the above parameters. Fifty-two echocardiographic studies immediately prior and 30–60 min following dialysis were performed. The anteroposterior IVCD was measured 1.5 cm below the diaphragm in the hepatic segment in supine position during normal inspiration and expiration. IVCD was expressed per body surface area.

Results. Following haemodialysis mean IVCD (average of expiration and inspiration) decreased from 1.12±0.38 to 0.75±0.26 cm/m2 (P<0.0001). Changes in IVCD were significantly correlated with alterations in body weight following dialysis (P<0.0001). The collapse index (per cent of change in IVCD in expiration vs inspiration) increased significantly after dialysis (P=0.035). IVCD clearly reflected alterations in fluid status. It did not vary significantly with changes in dry weight in a given patient.

Conclusions. Our findings support the applicability of VCD measurement in the estimation of hydration status in paediatric haemodialysis patients. The combination of clinical parameters and measurement of IVCD may enable more accurate evaluation of hydration of children on haemodialysis.

Keywords: inferior vena cava diameter; haemodialysis; children; hydration; echocardiography; dry weight

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Irit Krause, MD, Nephrology Clinic and Dialysis Unit, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah-Tiqva 49202, Israel.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. A. Levy and V. E. Noble
Bedside Ultrasound in Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): e1404 - e1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. A. Hoenich and N. W. Levin
Can technology solve the clinical problem of 'dry weight'?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 647 - 650.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.