Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caravaca, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez-Casado, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caravaca, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez-Casado, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 776-782
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Uraemic symptoms, nutritional status and renal function in pre-dialysis end-stage renal failure patients

Francisco Caravaca, Manuel Arrobas, José L. Pizarro and Emilio Sanchez-Casado

S. Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain

Background. Deciding on the right moment to initiate dialysis and finding the best method to establish this critical stage of chronic renal failure are both controversial issues. This study attempted to address this subject by correlating a uraemic score with the most common clinical methods for assessing renal function in pre-dialysis chronic renal failure (end-stage renal disease, ESRD) patients.

Methods. The study group consisted of 201 non-selected ESRD patients. A uraemic score, composed of the uraemic symptoms, the subjective global assessment of nutritional status, serum albumin concentration, and protein catabolic rate normalized for ideal body weight, was taken as a clinical marker of uraemic toxicity. Correlations that best fit this uraemic score with creatinine clearance (Ccr), the arithmetic mean of Ccr, urea clearance (Ccr-Cu) and Kt/V urea were then investigated.

Results. Thirty-six per cent of patients had malnutrition. By multiple logistic regression analysis, the presence of comorbidity, Ccr-Cu and haematocrit were the best determinants of malnutrition. The correlation that best fit Ccr or Ccr-Cu with the uraemic score was a cubic curve (r=0.38, P<0.0001, and r=0.42, P<0.0001, respectively), in which an ascending inflection was observed when Ccr and Ccr-Cu fell below 12–13 and 10 ml/min, respectively. However, the relationship between Kt/V urea and the uraemic score was less predictable, especially in male patients.

Conclusion. Ccr or Ccr-Cu are reliable methods for establishing the degree of severity of chronic renal failure below which the development of symptoms and malnutrition are highly prevalent. In contrast, Kt/V urea may be a less sensitive and specific method for assessing the severity of uraemia in ESRD patients.

Keywords: chronic renal failure; creatinine clearance; Kt/V urea; nutritional status; pre-dialysis

Correspondence and offprint requests to: F. Caravaca, S. Nefrología, Hospital Infanta Cristina, E-06080 Badajoz, Spain.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
V. Bellizzi, L. Scalfi, V. Terracciano, L. De Nicola, R. Minutolo, M. Marra, B. Guida, B. Cianciaruso, G. Conte, and B. R. Di Iorio
Early Changes in Bioelectrical Estimates of Body Composition in Chronic Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2006; 17(5): 1481 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
Y. Kuan, M. Hossain, J. Surman, A. M. El Nahas, and J. Haylor
GFR prediction using the MDRD and Cockcroft and Gault equations in patients with end-stage renal disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 2394 - 2401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.