Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 348-354
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Combined liver–kidney transplantation for primary hyperoxaluria type 1 in young children

Sally R. Ellis1, Sally-Anne Hulton,2, Patrick J. McKiernan1, Jean de Ville de Goyet1 and Deirdre A. Kelly1

1 The Liver Unit and 2 the Renal Unit, Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK

Background. Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a rare condition in which deficiency of the liver enzyme alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase leads to renal failure and systemic oxalosis. Combined liver–kidney transplantation (LKT) is recommended for end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in adults, but management of infants and young children is controversial. We retrospectively reviewed six children who underwent LKT for PH1.

Methods. The median age at diagnosis was 1.8 years (range 3 weeks to 7 years). Two children presented with severe infantile oxalosis at 3 and 9 weeks, five patients had ESRF with nephrocalcinosis and systemic oxalosis, (median duration of dialysis 1.3 years), and one had progressive chronic renal failure. Four children underwent combined LKT, one child staged liver then kidney, and one infant had an isolated liver transplant. The median age at transplantation was 8.9 years (range 1.7–15 years).

Results. Overall patient survival was four out of six. The two infants with PH1 and severe systemic oxalosis died (2 and 3 weeks post-transplant) due to cardiovascular oxalosis and sepsis. The other four children are well at median follow-up of 10 months (range 6 months to 7.4 years). No child developed hepatic rejection and all have normal liver function. Renal rejection occurred in three patients. Despite maximal medical management, oxalate deposits recurred in all renal grafts, contributing to graft loss in one (one of the infants who died), and significant dysfunction requiring haemodialysis post-transplant for 6 months.

Conclusions. LKT is effective therapy for primary oxalosis with ESRF but has a high morbidity and mortality rate in children who present in infancy with nephrocalcinosis and systemic oxalosis. We feel that earlier LKT, or pre-emptive liver transplantation, may be a better therapeutic strategy to improve the outlook for these patients.

Keywords: kidney; liver; nephrocalcinosis; primary hyperoxaluria; systemic oxalosis; transplantation

Correspondence and offprint requests to: S. A. Hulton, Department of Nephrology, Birmingham Children’s Hospital NHS Trust, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. J. Kemper, M. Burdelski, and D. E. Muller-Wiefel
Combined liver-kidney transplantation for primary hyperoxaluria type 1
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2113 - 2114.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.