Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by John, S.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by John, S.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16: 320-327
© 2001 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Effects of continuous haemofiltration vs intermittent haemodialysis on systemic haemodynamics and splanchnic regional perfusion in septic shock patients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial

Stefan John,1, Daniela Griesbach1, Mathias Baumgärtel1, Horst Weihprecht1, Roland E. Schmieder1 and Helmut Geiger2

1 Department of Medicine IV, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Klinikum Nürnberg-Süd, Nürnberg, 2 Department of Medicine IV, University of Frankfurt a.M. Frankfurt a.M., Germany

Background. Parameters of splanchnic regional perfusion, like intramucosal pH (pHi) and pCO2 (pCO2i), may predict outcome in septic shock patients. Continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) has been considered beneficial in haemodynamically unstable septic shock patients. In a prospective, randomized, clinical study, we investigated whether CVVH, in comparison to intermittent haemodialysis (IHD), is able to improve splanchnic regional perfusion in critically ill patients.

Methods. Thirty septic shock patients with acute renal failure were randomized to either CVVH (n=20) or IHD (n=10) groups for renal replacement therapy. Patient characteristics at baseline were not different in terms of severity of illness (APACHE II scores), haemodynamics, and pHi/pCO2i values. Systemic haemodynamics, oxygen transport variables, and splanchnic regional perfusion parameters were measured at 0.5, 2, 4 and 24 h after initiation of renal replacement therapy. There were no major changes in vasopressor support throughout the 24-h study period.

Results. In contrast to IHD, CVVH caused a decrease in heart rate (-3±11 vs +9±8/min, P<0.01) and an increase in systolic blood pressure (+12±1 vs -5±17 mmHg, P<0.05) after 2 h. After 24 h, increased systemic vascular resistance was found in the CVVH group in comparison with the IHD group (+312±755 vs -29±89 dyne/cm5, P<0.05) and was accompanied by a decrease in cardiac output (-1.54±1.4 vs -0.25±0.9 l/min, P<0.01). However pHi values remained constant throughout the 24-h study period in both groups and were not different between the groups (CVVH 7.19±0.1 vs IHD 7.19±0.1, n.s.) as did the pCO2i values (CVVH +7±17 vs IHD 0±15 mmHg, n.s.) and pCO2 gap values (CVVH +6±15 vs IHD +5±12 mmHg, n.s.).

Conclusions. Despite different changes of systemic haemodynamics between CVVH and IHD, CVVH did not improve parameters of splanchnic regional perfusion like pHi, pCO2i or pCO2 gap in septic shock patients.

Keywords: acute renal failure; continuous haemofiltration; haemodynamics; intramucosal acidosis; oxygen transport; splanchnic regional perfusion

Correspondence and offprint requests to: PD Dr med. S. John, Department of Medicine IV, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Klinikum Nürnberg-Süd, Breslauerstr. 201, D-90471 Nürnberg, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. L. Lins, M. M. Elseviers, P. Van der Niepen, E. Hoste, M. L. Malbrain, P. Damas, J. Devriendt, and for the SHARF investigators
Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury patients admitted to the intensive care unit: results of a randomized clinical trial
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 512 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. Davenport, C. Bouman, A. Kirpalani, P. Skippen, A. Tolwani, R. L. Mehta, and P. M. Palevsky
Delivery of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: What Are the Key Issues?
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 869 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
N. Pannu, S. Klarenbach, N. Wiebe, B. Manns, M. Tonelli, and for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network
Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Acute Renal Failure: A Systematic Review
JAMA, February 20, 2008; 299(7): 793 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. John and K.-U. Eckardt
Renal Replacement Strategies in the ICU
Chest, October 1, 2007; 132(4): 1379 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. C. Cho, J. Himmelfarb, E. Paganini, T. A. Ikizler, S. H. Soroko, R. L. Mehta, and G. M. Chertow
Survival by Dialysis Modality in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 3132 - 3138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Rokyta Jr, M. Matejovic, A. Krouzecky, K. Opatrny Jr, J. Ruzicka, and I. Novak
Effects of continuous venovenous haemofiltration-induced cooling on global haemodynamics, splanchnic oxygen and energy balance in critically ill patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 623 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. S. De Vriese
Prevention and Treatment of Acute Renal Failure in Sepsis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2003; 14(3): 792 - 805.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.