Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenkranz, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenkranz, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 1290-1292
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Editorial Comments

Proteinuria in the transplanted patient

Alexander R. Rosenkranz and Gert Mayer

Leopold Franzens Universität Innsbruck, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin, Klinische Abteilung für Nephrologie, Innsbruck, Austria

Proteinuria and progressive renal disease—the unfortunate twins

The phenomenon of glomerular proteinuria has received considerable attention since it was suggested by Remuzzi and co-workers [1] that increased urinary protein concentrations might per se contribute to the progressive nature of renal disease. Findings of the Ramipril Efficacy in Nephropathy (REIN) studies are compatible with this assumption as the degree of nephroprotection obtained by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy much better correlated with the reduction of urinary protein excretion than with systemic haemodynamic effects [2].

Although a definite pathophysiological link between proteinuria and progression of renal disease has yet to be established, it is generally accepted that proteinuria is at least a reliable prognostic marker. This is true for patients with secondary focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis, the structural correlate typically present in patients with a reduction of nephron mass [3], but also at least in some ‘immunologically’ mediated primary glomerulonephritides. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Is interstitial allograft disease after transplantation mediated by urinary proteins?

Will treatment of post-transplant proteinuria preserve renal allograft function?

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Djamali, M. Samaniego, J. Torrealba, J. Pirsch, and B. L Muth
Increase in proteinuria >200 mg/g after late rejection is associated with poor graft survival
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 23, 2009; (2009) gfp613v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. Djamali, M. Samaniego, B. Muth, R. Muehrer, R. M. Hofmann, J. Pirsch, A. Howard, G. Mourad, and B. N. Becker
Medical Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients after the First Posttransplant Year
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2006; 1(4): 623 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. Reichel, M. Zeier, and E. Ritz
Proteinuria after renal transplantation: pathogenesis and management
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 301 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]