Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pokorná, E.
Right arrow Articles by Schück, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pokorná, E.
Right arrow Articles by Schück, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 705-710
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Adverse effect of donor arteriolosclerosis on graft outcome after renal transplantation

Eva Pokorná, Stefan Vítko, Maria Chadimová and Otto Schück

Transplant Centre, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic

Introduction. In recent years less strict criteria for renal graft donors have been applied. Our study was designed to investigate whether the histological picture, with special reference to vascular changes of the donor kidney, has an effect on the development and level of graft function, and on 48-month graft survival.

Methods. Three morphologically distinct groups were formed from 150 consecutive cadaveric kidneys donors transplanted into 290 recipients. A control group (C) consisted of kidneys with a completely normal histological picture. Group M1 included kidneys with mild arteriolosclerosis and group M2 (n=122) was comprised of kidneys showing significant arteriolosclerosis. The onset of graft function was assessed by the need for dialysis treatment post-transplantation and the levels of serum creatinine and creatinine clearance at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post transplant.

Results. The proportion of sclerotic glomeruli (P<0.001) and the incidence and severity of interstitial fibrosis was greater in groups M1 and M2 than in the control group (M1, P<0.01; M2, P<0.001). The incidence of vascular fibrinoid necrosis in M2 was greater than in controls (P<0.001). The onset of graft function did not differ significantly between the groups. Group M2 showed a significantly lower level of graft function (P<0.001). The 4-year graft survival rate of group M2 was 74.2%, significantly lower than in the combined group C+M1 (P=0.03).

Conclusion. Significant vascular lesions in the donor kidney should be taken into account when predicting graft function and survival.

Keywords: arteriolosclerosis; marginal donor; procurement renal biopsy; transplant outcome

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Eva Pokorná, MD, Transplant Centre, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeòská 1958/9, 140 21 Prague 4, Czech Republic. E-mail: eva. pokorna{at}medicon. cz.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
O. Viklicky, I. Netuka, M. Urbanova, M. Adamec, J. Maly, L. Voska, and E. Pokorna
Kidney transplantation from a brain-dead heart transplant candidate treated with biventricular assist device: 12-month follow-up
NDT Plus, February 1, 2008; 1(1): 34 - 35.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. C. Grimm, P. Nickerson, J. Gough, R. McKenna, E. Stern, J. Jeffery, and D. N. Rush
Computerized Image Analysis of Sirius Red-Stained Renal Allograft Biopsies as a Surrogate Marker to Predict Long-Term Allograft Function
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2003; 14(6): 1662 - 1668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.