Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hufnagel, G.
Right arrow Articles by Mignon, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hufnagel, G.
Right arrow Articles by Mignon, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 684-688
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Effects of atorvastatin on dyslipidaemia in uraemic patients on peritoneal dialysis

Gilles Hufnagel, Catherine Michel, François Vrtovsnik, Guillaume Queffeulou, Niloufar Kossari and Françoise Mignon

Department of Nephrology, Hôpital Bichat, University Bichat–Claude Bernard, and Association pour l'utilisation du rein artificiel, Paris, France

Background. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin, a potent cholesterol- and triglyceride-lowering agent, in peritoneal dialysis patients with dyslipidaemia.

Methods. Peritoneal dialysis patients with hypercholesterolaemia were treated for 4 months with atorvastatin at a starting dose of 10 mg. The dose could be increased to 20 or 40 mg in order to achieve the following targets: plasma LDL-cholesterol of 130 mg/dl for primary prevention of coronary heart disease, plasma LDL cholesterol of 100 mg/dl for secondary prevention, and plasma triglycerides of 200 mg/dl. Plasma lipid profile and liver and muscle enzyme levels were assessed at baseline and then monthly during treatment.

Results. Thirty-one patients with hypercholesterolaemia were included (16 males and 15 females; mean age 57±16 years; mean duration of peritoneal dialysis 27±17 months). Nineteen of the patients also had hypertriglyceridaemia and seven had diabetes. Twenty patients had no coronary history (primary prevention), whereas nine had experienced a coronary event (secondary prevention). In the primary and the secondary prevention patients, mean LDL-cholesterol levels (mg/dl) decreased significantly by 42 and 46% from 204±23 to 119±27 (P<0.001) and 198±37 to 104±21 (P<0.001), and mean triglyceride levels (mg/dl) decreased by 37 and 26% from 289±132 to 186±92 (P<0.001) and 201±62 to 150±54 (P<0.001 respectively). Nineteen primary prevention and seven secondary prevention patients achieved the LDL-cholesterol target. The triglyceride target was achieved by 15 of the 19 hypertriglyceridaemic patients. Two patients stopped treatment (one because of gastrointestinal disturbances, the other because of an allergic skin reaction). After 4 months, there were no changes in enzyme levels.

Conclusion. Atorvastatin is an effective and safe lipid-lowering agent for peritoneal dialysis patients with mixed dyslipidaemia.

Keywords: atorvastatin; hypercholesterolaemia; hypertriglyceridaemia; mixed dyslipidaemia; peritoneal dialysis

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Docteur Gilles Hufnagel, Department of Nephrology, Hôpital Bichat, 46 rue Henri-Huchard, F-75877 Paris Cedex 18, France.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. L. Lins, K. E. Matthys, G. A. Verpooten, P. C. Peeters, M. Dratwa, J.-C. Stolear, and N. H. Lameire
Pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin and its metabolites after single and multiple dosing in hypercholesterolaemic haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 967 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.