Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, R. N.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, M. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 1667-1672
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Workload generated by a living donor programme for renal transplantation

Richard N. Saunders, Rosemary Elwell, Gavin J. Murphy, Terry Horsburgh, Susan J. Carr and Michael L. Nicholson

Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK

Background. The ethical and medical implications of live kidney donation result in a comprehensive work-up process. The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude of the workload and the yield of renal transplants generated by a live donor programme.

Methods. Referrals to the Leicester live donor programme over the five-year period 1994–1998 were retrospectively assessed. These were initiated by nephrology referral and subsequently investigated in a stepwise manner. Patients were counselled and baseline tests performed prior to consultant surgeon review and assessment of donor renal function/anatomy.

Results. One hundred and fifty referrals consisting of 150 recipients with 269 potential donors were originally made. This resulted in 32/120 (27%) related and 3/30 (10%) unrelated recipients (P=0.06) and 32/220 (15%) related and 3/49 (6%) unrelated donors proceeding to live donor transplantation, with a mean work-up time (±SD) of 9 (±7) months. One hundred and fifteen recipients (77%) and 234 (87%) donors failed to proceed at various stages of assessment, for a variety of immunological, medical and social reasons. A large number of expensive immunological investigations were required for potential donors, the majority of which did not proceed to transplantation. However as a result of performing these in the early stages of assessment the number of more invasive tests is kept to a minimum.

Conclusions. There is a relatively low yield of transplants from live donor referrals, particularly those between unrelated individuals. The vast majority of referrals fail to proceed for legitimate reasons, but as a result, create a significant workload with notable staffing and financial implications.

Keywords: live organ donor; renal transplant; workload

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Mr R. N. Saunders, Transplant Fellow, University Department of Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. R. Calder and R. W. Chang
Panning for gold: screening for potential live kidney donors
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1276 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Voiculescu, K. Ivens, G. R. Hetzel, M. Hollenbeck, W. Sandmann, K. Grabitz, K. Balzer, F. Schneider, and B. Grabensee
Kidney transplantation from related and unrelated living donors in a single German centre
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 418 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.