Nephrol Dial Transplant (1999) 14: 1991-1996
© 1999 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association
Rapid and accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal transplants using serum cystatin C
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Division of Nephrology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Professor Dr A. R. Huber, Head of the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, CH-5001 Aarau, Switzerland.
Background. Assessment of renal function in patients with renal transplants is of great importance. Various studies have reported cystatin C as an easily and rapidly assessable marker that can be used for accurate information on renal function impairment. To date, no study is available to define the role of cystatin C in patients with renal transplants.
Methods. Thirty steady-state patients (50% male/50% female) with status post-kidney transplantation were studied. To assess renal function, cystatin C, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, ß2-microglobulin (ß2M), and [125I]iothalamate clearance were determined. Correlations and non-parametric ROC curves for accuracy, using a cut-off glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 60 ml/min, were obtained for the different markers allowing for calculations of positive predictive values (PPV), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), specificity and sensitivity, respectively. Further, to evaluate the usefulness of these markers for monitoring, intraindividual coefficients of variation (CVs) for cystatin C and creatinine measurements were compared in 85 renal transplant patients. Measurements consisted of at least six pairs of results, which were obtained at different time points during routine follow-up.
Results. Cystatin C correlated best with GFR (r=0.83), whereas serum creatinine (r=0.67), creatinine clearance (r=0.57) and ß2M (r=0.58) all had lower correlation coefficients. The diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was significantly better than serum creatinine (P=0.025), but did not differ significantly from creatinine clearance (P=0.76) and ß2M (P=0.43). At a cut-off of 1.64 mg/l, cystatin C has a PPV of 93%, PLR of 6.4, specificity 89% and sensitivity 70%, respectively. For ß2M, PPV 83%, PLR 1.7, specificity 67% and sensitivity 75% was seen at a cut-off of 3.57 mg/l. Accordingly, at a cut-off of 125 µmol/l for serum creatinine, a PPV 76%, PLR 1.4, specificity 44% and sensitivity 80% was revealed. Finally, at a cut-off of 66 ml/min/1.73 m2 for creatinine clearance, the following characteristics were found: PPV 94%, PLR 7.7, specificity 89% and sensitivity 85%. The intraindividual variation of creatinine was significantly lower than that of cystatin C (P<0.001). With increasing concentrations, their ratios of CV tended towards a value of 1, demonstrating identical variability at low GFR.
Conclusion. Together, our data show that in patients with renal transplants, cystatin C, in terms of PPV and PLR, has a similar diagnostic value as creatinine clearance. However, it is superior to serum determinations of creatinine and ß2M. The intraindividual variation of cystatin C is greater than that of creatinine. This might be due to the better ability of cystatin C to reflect temporary changes especially in mildly impaired GFR, most critical for early detection of rejection and other function impairment. Thus, cystatin C allows for rapid and accurate assessment of renal function (GFR) in renal transplants and is clearly superior to the commonly used serum creatinine.
Keywords: cystatin C; glomerular filtration rate; intraindividual variability; kidney transplantation; renal function markers; ROC curve
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Gourishankar, M. Courtney, G. S. Jhangri, G. Cembrowski, and N. Pannu Serum cystatin C performs similarly to traditional markers of kidney function in the evaluation of donor kidney function prior to and following unilateral nephrectomy Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 3004 - 3009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Ledson, M. L. P. Howse, N. B. Roberts, G. J. Kemp, and P. S. Williams Cystatin C as a surrogate for glomerular filtration rate in the presence of proteinuria NDT Plus, June 1, 2008; 1(3): 194 - 195. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Zahran, M. Qureshi, and A. Shoker Comparison between creatinine and cystatin C-based GFR equations in renal transplantation Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2659 - 2668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Hojs, S. Bevc, R. Ekart, M. Gorenjak, and L. Puklavec Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with mild to moderate impairment of kidney function Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1855 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. K. van Rossum, R. Zietse, A. G. Vulto, and Y. B. de Rijke Renal extraction of cystatin C vs 125I-iothalamate in hypertensive patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1253 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Risch, H. Drexel, and A. R. Huber Differences in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimates by 2 Cystatin C-Based Equations Clin. Chem., November 1, 2005; 51(11): 2211 - 2212. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R. Huber and L. Risch Recent Developments in the Evaluation of Glomerular Filtration Rate: Is There a Place for {beta}-Trace? Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1329 - 1330. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Conti, M. Zater, K. Lallali, A. Durrbach, S. Moutereau, P. Manivet, P. Eschwege, and S. Loric Absence of Circadian Variations in Urine Cystatin C Allows Its Use on Urinary Samples Clin. Chem., January 1, 2005; 51(1): 272 - 273. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Poge, T. Gerhardt, A. Bokenkamp, B. Stoffel-Wagner, H.-U. Klehr, T. Sauerbruch, and R. P. Woitas Time course of low molecular weight proteins in the early kidney transplantation period--influence of corticosteroids Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2858 - 2863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. J. Hoek, F. A. W. Kemperman, and R. T. Krediet A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2024 - 2031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. F. Laterza, C. P. Price, and M. G. Scott Cystatin C: An Improved Estimator of Glomerular Filtration Rate? Clin. Chem., May 1, 2002; 48(5): 699 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Risch, R. Herklotz, A. Blumberg, and A. R. Huber Effects of Glucocorticoid Immunosuppression on Serum Cystatin C Concentrations in Renal Transplant Patients Clin. Chem., November 1, 2001; 47(11): 2055 - 2059. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Serdar, I. Kurt, F. Ozcelik, M. Urhan, S. Ilgan, M. Yenicesu, L. Kenar, and T. Kutluay A Practical Approach to Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurements: Creatinine Clearance Estimation Using Cimetidine Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., July 1, 2001; 31(3): 265 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. L. KASISKE, M. A. VAZQUEZ, W. E. HARMON, R. S. BROWN, G. M. DANOVITCH, R. S. GASTON, D. ROTH, J. D. SCANDLING JR., and G. G. SINGER Recommendations for the Outpatient Surveillance of Renal Transplant Recipients J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2000; 11 (90001): S1 - S86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Le Bricon, E. Thervet, M. Froissart, M. Benlakehal, B. Bousquet, C. Legendre, and D. Erlich Plasma Cystatin C Is Superior to 24-h Creatinine Clearance and Plasma Creatinine for Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate 3 Months after Kidney Transplantation Clin. Chem., August 1, 2000; 46(8): 1206 - 1207. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. P. Woitas, B. Stoffel-Wagner, S. Flommersfeld, U. Poege, P. Schiedermaier, H.-U. Klehr, U. Spengler, F. Bidlingmaier, and T. Sauerbruch Correlation of Serum Concentrations of Cystatin C and Creatinine to Inulin Clearance in Liver Cirrhosis Clin. Chem., May 1, 2000; 46(5): 712 - 715. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|