Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Besouw, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weimar, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Besouw, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weimar, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1999) 14: 2710-2713
© 1999 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Effect of mycophenolate mofetil on erythropoiesis in stable renal transplant patients is correlated with mycophenolic acid trough levels

Nicole M. van Besouw1, Barbara J. van der Mast1, Peter J. H. Smak Gregoor1, Cees J. Hesse1, Jan N. M. IJzermans2, Teun van Gelder1 and Willem Weimar1

1 Departments of Internal Medicine I and 2 Surgery, University Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr N. M. van Besouw, University Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt, Department of Internal Medicine I, Room Bd299, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Background. Both mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) are immunosuppressive drugs that inhibit purine synthesis. In theory, MMF selectively inhibits lymphocyte proliferation, while AZA has well-known effects on red blood cells and thrombocytes as well. In renal transplant recipients we replaced CsA therapy by MMF in an attempt to reduce the immunosuppressive load 1 year after kidney transplantation. During this study we observed the effect of MMF on haematological parameters such as haemoglobin (Hb), leukocytes, and thrombocytes.

Methods. One year after kidney transplantation 26 stable patients were converted from cyclosporin A (CsA) to MMF (2 g/day). Thereafter, these patients were tapered twice in their MMF dose from 2 g to 1.5 g (4 months after conversion) and from 1.5 to 1 g (8 months after conversion) per day. The Hb levels, leukocyte and thrombocyte counts, and mycophenolic acid (MPA) trough levels were routinely measured.

Results. After conversion from CsA to MMF not only creatinine levels and the number of leukocytes, but also the haemoglobin (Hb) level significantly decreased in 21/26 patients (P=0.0004). In eight patients the Hb level dropped more than 1 mmol/l (=1.61 g/dl). Only in two of eight patients was an explanation for blood loss found. The effect on Hb level did not ameliorate after the first MMF dose reduction to 1.5 g/day. After tapering the MMF dose to 1 g/day, the Hb approached the pre-conversion level. Not only the MMF dose but also the mycophenolic acid (MPA) trough level correlated with the Hb level.

Conclusions. After conversion from CsA to MMF 1 year after kidney transplantation, a decrease in Hb level and leukocyte count was observed. The MPA trough level correlated also with the Hb level. The effect on the Hb level was reversible after dose reduction. This finding suggests that MMF exerts a negative effect on erythropoietic cells.

Keywords: cyclosporin A; haemoglobin; kidney transplantation; leukocytes; mycophenolate mofetil; mycophenolic acid


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
D. Cattaneo, M. Cortinovis, S. Baldelli, A. Bitto, E. Gotti, G. Remuzzi, and N. Perico
Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolate Sodium and Comparison with the Mofetil Formulation in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1147 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
T. M. Sievers
New Antiproliferative Immunosuppressive Agents
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2003; 16(6): 401 - 413.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. Francois, A. Durrbach, M. Amor, R. Djeffal, F. Kriaa, V. Paradis, P. Bedossa, and B. Charpentier
The long-term effect of switching from cyclosporin A to mycophenolate mofetil in chronic renal graft dysfunction compared with conventional management
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1909 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
I. Neumann, M. Haidinger, H. Jager, H. Grutzmacher, A. Griesmacher, M. M. Muller, P. M. Bayer, and F. Thomas Meisl
Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases Compared Renal Transplant Recipients
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2003; 14(3): 721 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Mourad, J. Malaise, D. Chaib Eddour, M. De Meyer, J. Konig, R. Schepers, J. P. Squifflet, and P. Wallemacq
Pharmacokinetic Basis for the Efficient and Safe Use of Low-Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination with Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2001; 47(7): 1241 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Meeus, T. Messiaen, G. Verhoef, and Y. Vanrenterghem
New-onset anaemia following kidney transplantation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2059 - 2061.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. L. KASISKE, M. A. VAZQUEZ, W. E. HARMON, R. S. BROWN, G. M. DANOVITCH, R. S. GASTON, D. ROTH, J. D. SCANDLING JR., and G. G. SINGER
Recommendations for the Outpatient Surveillance of Renal Transplant Recipients
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2000; 11 (90001): S1 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.