Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Santana, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez, A.
Right arrow Articles by Santana, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 9 2335-2340, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Automated peritoneal dialysis: a Spanish multicentre study

A Rodriguez, N Diz, L Cubillo, J Plana, M Riscos, R Delgado, C Herrera, E Ribes, F Molina, M Heras, A Gonzalez, C Canton, A Fernandez, E Laborda, M Zurita, F Giron and P Santana
Department of Nephrology, Hospital Nuestra Señora del Pino, Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Spain; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Virgen de Rocío, Sevilla, Spain; Hospital de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Virgen de la Luz, Cuenca, Spain; Hospital Virgen de la Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain; Hospital Insular, Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Spain; Hospital Carlos Haya, Malaga, Spain; Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huela, Spain; Department of Mathematics, University of Las Palmas, Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Spain; Corresponding author at: Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Nuestra Señra del Pino, Angel Guimera 96, E-35004 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

Background: A prospective sequential study on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and three techniques of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) was conducted to assess peritoneal clearances, the influence of peritoneal permeability on nocturnal APD clearances and the suitability of the peritoneal equilibration test (PET) for predicting clearances on APD. Methods: After performing a PET, a series of clinical, biochemical and dialysis adequacy markers were evaluated after 2 months on CAPD, continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) and tidal volume peritoneal dialysis (TPD) with 50% and 25% tidal volumes. Forty five patients participated and 33 completed the study. Results: Serum urea and creatinine decreased significantly whereas haemoglobin and glucose increased. Mean peritoneal urea clearance (1/week) was 55.40±8.76 on CAPD, 74.82±12.62 on CCPD, 69.20±14.63 on TPD (tidal 50%) and 66.89±13.23 on TPD (tidal 25%); mean creatinine clearance (1/week/1.73 m2) was 42.80±9.95, 52.19±11.11, 51.31±13.3 and 49.17±11.83 respectively. Both clearances were significantly lower on CAPD than on APD (<0.001). CCPD was the automated technique that provided the best nocturnal urea clearance (P<0.01). Nocturnal creatinine clearance did not show significant differences between CCPD and TPD (tidal 50%), being better with both techniques than with TPD (tidal 25%). There were statistically significant differences between nocturnal dialysate to plasma (D/P) ratios and those corresponding to the nearest times in the PET. The urea D/P ratio at 180 min and the creatinine D/P ratio at 240 min of the PET were the parameters that better estimated nocturnal clearances on APD. Conclusions: This study confirms that TPD does not improve the results of CCPD. Significant differences between D/P ratios during actual nocturnal cycles and PETs were observed. Key words: automated peritoneal dialysis; CAPD; clearances; PET
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. S. Rabindranath, J. Adams, T. Z. Ali, C. Daly, L. Vale, and A. M. MacLeod
Automated vs continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2991 - 2998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Scanziani, B. Dozio, I. Baragetti, and S. Maroni
Intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure and flow characteristics of peritoneal catheters in automated peritoneal dialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2391 - 2398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.