Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johner, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johner, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 8 2098-2103, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


TECHNICAL REPORT

Evaluation of an ultrasonic blood volume monitor

C Johner, P Chamney, D Schneditz and M Kramer
Fresenius Medical Care, Innovation and Technology, Bad Homburg, Germany; Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK; Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Correspondence to: C Johner, Fresenius Medical Care, Innovation and Technology, Daimlerstrasse 15, D-61352 Bad Homburg, Germany

Background. Hypotension complicates approximately 30% of all dialysis treatments. Although the genesis of hypotension is multifactorial, hypovolaemia is thought to play a major role as a direct result of decreased blood volume, particularly during ultrafiltration. The described blood volume monitor enables blood volume to be measured continuously by a non-invasive technique. Methods. The blood volume monitor is based on the principle that the total protein concentration, the sum of haemoglobin and plasma proteins in the vascular space, changes during ultrafiltration. Changes of total protein concentration are determined from the velocity of sound waves in blood, measured using a cuvette in the extracorporeal circuit designed for this purpose. The precision of the blood volume monitor was evaluated in 180 dialysis treatments in 49 patients. The relative blood volume obtained by the monitor was compared with a standard reference method involving calculation of relative blood volume from serial measurements of haemoglobin. Results. A very good agreement between the two methods was achieved (SD = 1.70%, r >0.96). The results showed no sensitivity to changes in serum sodium concentration (range 130-145 mmol). The 'noise' introduced in the blood volume signal was low (⩽0.2%, sampling rate 10 s) allowing subtle blood volume changes to be detected with high resolution. In addition the device enabled the measurement of haematocrit (Hct) and haemoglobin (Hb) to be made since this is the largest blood component determining total protein concentration. A comparison with the centrifuge method revealed an accuracy of ± 2.9Hct-%, and a comparison with the photometer an accuracy of ±0.8g Hb/dl. Conclusion. In summary the blood volume monitor allows precise and reliable measurement of relative blood volume. It provides the instrumentation essential for feedback control of relative blood volume during dialysis. Keywords: blood volume, haemodialysis; haemoglobin; instrumentation; ultrafiltration; ultrasound
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
J. J. Dasselaar, M. N. Lub-de Hooge, J. Pruim, H. Nijnuis, A. Wiersum, P. E. de Jong, R. M. Huisman, and C. F.M. Franssen
Relative Blood Volume Changes Underestimate Total Blood Volume Changes during Hemodialysis
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2007; 2(4): 669 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. W. Nette, E. H. Y. Ie, W. B. Vletter, R. Krams, W. Weimar, and R. Zietse
Norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction results in decreased blood volume in dialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1305 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. J. Dasselaar, R. M. Huisman, P. E. de Jong, and C. F. M. Franssen
Measurement of relative blood volume changes during haemodialysis: merits and limitations
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2043 - 2049.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. Mitra, P. Chamney, R. Greenwood, and K. Farrington
The Relationship Between Systemic and Whole-Body Hematocrit Is Not Constant during Ultrafiltration on Hemodialysis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2004; 15(2): 463 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Barth, W. Boer, D. Garzoni, T. Kuenzi, W. Ries, R. Schaefer, D. Schneditz, T. Tsobanelis, F. van der Sande, R. Wojke, et al.
Characteristics of hypotension-prone haemodialysis patients: is there a critical relative blood volume?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1353 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
W. Secomski, A. Nowicki, F. Guidi, P. Tortoli, and P. A. Lewin
Noninvasive In Vivo Measurements of Hematocrit
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2003; 22(4): 375 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. W. Nette, H. P. Krepel, A. H. van den Meiracker, W. Weimar, and R. Zietse
Specific effect of the infusion of glucose on blood volume during haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1275 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. Feidhlim Woods, H. P. Krepel, and R. Zietse
Variability of relative blood volume during haemodialysis?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 430 - 431.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Basile
Should relative blood volume changes be routinely measured during the dialysis session?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2001; 16(1): 10 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.