Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dhondt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lameire, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dhondt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lameire, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 7 1752-1758, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Citrate anticoagulation does not correct cuprophane bioincompatibility as evaluated by the expression of leukocyte surface molecules

A Dhondt, R Vanhoder, M Waterloos, G Glorieux, R De Smet and N Lameire
Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Division, University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Gent, Belgium; Corresponding author

Background: Citrate, used for the anticoagulation of the extracorporeal dialysis circuit, reduces ionized calcium by chelation and has been claimed to attenuate dialyser membrane bioincompatibility. Dialysis with complement-activating cuprophane membranes is associated with leukopenia which has been related to an increase in adhesion molecule expression on the surface of circulating leukocytes. Methods: The effect of citrate anticoagulation on the expression of CD11b, CD11c and CD45 on the surface of granulocytes and CD14 on monocytes during haemodialysis with cuprophane membranes, was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis. A comparison of standard heparin vs citrate was performed in 14 chronic haemodialysis patients. During citrate anticoagulation a calcium-free dialysate was used and citrate was infused to obtain a concentration of 4.3 mmol/l blood. The unchallenged 'baseline state' expression of the surface molecule and the increase after ex vivo stimulation with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (delta-PMA) or formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (delta-fMLP) was studied. Results: With heparin, as well as with citrate, a sharp fall in granulocyte and monocyte count was observed after 15 min of dialysis, followed by a recovery at the end of the session. The expression of CD11b, CD11c ad CD45 on granulocytes increased markedly during cuprophane dialysis with a peak at 15 min; there were no differences in response between heparin and citrate anticoagulation. Delta-PMA and delta-fMLP for CD45, CD11c and CD14 showed a decrease during cuprophane dialysis vs t0; again there were no differences between heparin and citrate. Conclusion: We conclude that the use of citrate was not associated with reduced leukocyte activation as measured by the expression of surface molecules during cuprophane dialysis and that no effect on dialysis leukocytopenia could be registered. Key words: adhesion molecule; biocompatibility; calcium; citrate; cuprophane; haemodialysis
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Kozik-Jaromin, V. Nier, U. Heemann, B. Kreymann, and J. Bohler
Citrate pharmacokinetics and calcium levels during high-flux dialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 2244 - 2251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. De Smet, J. Van Kaer, H. Liebich, G. Lesaffer, A. Verstraete, A. Dhondt, P. Duym, N. Lameire, and R. Vanholder
Heparin-induced Release of Protein-bound Solutes during Hemodialysis Is an in Vitro Artifact
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2001; 47(5): 901 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.