Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arvanigidou, M.
Right arrow Articles by Vayonas, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arvanigidou, M.
Right arrow Articles by Vayonas, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 4 949-954, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Microbiological quality of water and dialysate in all haemodialysis centres of Greece

M Arvanigidou, S Spaia, C Katsinas, P Pangidis, T Constantinidis, V Katsouyannopoulos and G Vayonas
Renal Department, 2nd Hospital of IKA, Greece; Laboratory of Hygiene, Medical School, University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece; Corresponding author

Background: Bacterial contamination of treated water and dialysate comprises an important problem for patients undergoing haemodialysis. Both the progressive reduction of the thickness of cellulose membranes and the expanding use of high-flux membranes probably enhance the risk of pyrogenic reactions, therefore increasing the need for atoxic water and non-pyrogenic dialysis fluid. Methods: Samples of tap water, treated water, and effluent dialysate in all 85 haemodialysis centres in Greece were examined for total heterotrophic bacteria counts employing the pour plate method, total and faecal coliforms, faecal streptococci and pseudomonas spp. using the membrane filter technique, and sulphite-reducing clostridia applying the most probable number method. Overall 255 paired samples were tested from January to March 1997. Results: For total heterotrophic bacteria, the overall compliance of treated water and dialysate to the American Association of Medical Instrumentation standards (<200 c.f.u./ml for water and <2000 c.f.u./ml for dialysate) was 92.6 and 63.7% respectively, whereas the compliance of tap water samples to our national standards (total heterotrophic bacteria (<10 c.f.u./ml and absence of the other indicator bacteria) was 80.7%. The most commonly isolated bacteria were pseudomonas spp., found in 22.2% of treated water and 59.5% of dialysate samples, whereas the respective frequencies were 12.3 and 36.2% for total coliforms, 8.6 and 30.0% for faecal coliforms, 14.8 and 28.7% for faecal streptococci, and sulphite-reducing clostridia were isolated in 5.8% of dialysate samples only. Haemodialysis centres equipped with storage tanks for treated water experienced lower levels of total heterotrophic bacteria but higher counts of total and faecal coliforms, faecal streptococci, and pseudomonas spp., although the difference was statistically significant only for faecal streptococci counts, (P<0.05). Sixty-seven haemodialysis centres were equipped with bacterial filters, but mean values of all the examined microorganisms were not statistically different form those of the other centres. Faecal streptococci counts in treated water samples were positively correlated with ageing of both haemodialysis centres (P<0.005) and purification system (P<0.05), whereas pseudomonas counts were significantly correlated with ageing of the purification system (P<0.05). Key words: bacterial contamination; coliforms; haemodialysis; quality of water treatment; pseudomonas spp.; streptococci
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. Yamaguchi, T. Baba, S. Nakagawa, A. Saito, and M. Nasu
Rapid monitoring of bacteria in dialysis fluids by fluorescent vital staining and microcolony methods
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 612 - 616.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Canaud, V. Wizemann, F. Pizzarelli, R. Greenwood, G. Schultze, C. Weber, and D. Falkenhagen
Cellular interleukin-1 receptor antagonist production in patients receiving on-line haemodiafiltration therapy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2181 - 2187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Bommer
Sterile filtration of dialysate: is it really of no use?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 1992 - 1994.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. Perez-Garcia and P. O C. Rodriguez-Benitez
Why and how to monitor bacterial contamination of dialysate?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 760 - 764.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. van der Linde, B. T. Lim, J. M. M. Rondeel, L. P. M. T. Antonissen, and G. M. Th. de Jong
Improved bacteriological surveillance of haemodialysis fluids: a comparison between Tryptic soy agar and Reasoner's 2A media
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2433 - 2437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.