Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan-Pavlovcic, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nadja, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan-Pavlovcic, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nadja, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 2 311-315, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Captopril renography and duplex Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension

S Kaplan-Pavlovcic and C Nadja
Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre, Zaloska 7, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia; Corresponding author

Background. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the clinical usefulness of captopril renal scintigraphy and duplex Doppler sonography in detecting haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (⩾60%) and predicting cure or improvement of hypertension following revascularisation. Methods. Twenty-eight patients with moderate or high index of clinical suspicion of renovascular hypertension underwent both captopril renal scintigraphy and duplex Doppler sonography before undergoing renal angiography. Patients with angiographically proved (⩾60%) RAS were treated by percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty unless it was contraindicated. Results. The results of captopril renal scintigraphy and duplex Doppler sonography were compared by renal angiography of 45 renal arteries in 28 patients. Eleven renal arteries were excluded from further comparison, because no accurate Doppler signal could be obtained. The sensitivity and specificity of captopril renal scintigraphy in the identification of RAS (⩾60%) was 78% and 81% respectively. The sensitivity of duplex Doppler sonography was 83% and the specificity was 81%. Positive predictive values of both tests for blood pressure cure or improvement after PTRA were 86% for CRS and 85% for DDS. Conclusions. Captopril renal scintigraphy and duplex Doppler sonography are comparable tests for detection of patients with haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (⩾60%). Positive predictive values of both tests for cure or improvement of hypertension after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty are good and comparable. Keywords: captopril renal scintigraphy; duplex Doppler sonography; renovascular hypertension
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.