Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siewert-Delle, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilhelmsen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siewert-Delle, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilhelmsen, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 12 3084-3090, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Does treated primary hypertension lead to end-stage renal disease? A 20-year follow-up of the primary prevention study in Goteborg, [Sweden]

A Siewert-Delle, S Ljungman, O Andersson and L Wilhelmsen
Department of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Hypertension Clinic, and Preventive Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45, Goteborg, Sweden; Corresponding author

Background. Hypertension is reported to be one of the most common causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Europe and in the United States. However, the frequency with which treated primary hypertension leads to renal failure is not known. The majority of patients with ESRD have hypertension. Whether this is the cause or the consequence of the impaired renal function is often not possible to establish. Methods. To determine if treated primary hypertension can lead to ESRD, we studied the development of serum creatinine levels in 686 white hypertensive men, recruited from a random third of the male population aged 47-55 years living in Goteborg, Sweden (n=9998; 7495 participants). At entry and during 20 years follow-up, all signs of kidney disease, secondary hypertension, or increase in blood pressure were investigated. Records of patients with a serum creatinine value ⩾130 &mgr;mol/l at any time during the observation period were thoroughly studied to ascertain the cause of the impaired renal function. Results. A serum creatinine level above 130 &mgr;mol was seen in 8.9% (61/686) of the treated hypertensives during the 20 years of follow-up. An underlying renal disorder was found in 7.2% (49/686) of the patients; renoparenchymal disease (2.2%), renovascular disease (1.5%), diabetic nephropathy (1.2%) or a urological disease (1.6%). Only 1.7% (12/686) of the hypertensives showed a moderate progressive increase in serum creatinine of unknown cause. The serum creatinine in this group was 133±8 &mgr;mol/l (mean±SD; range 124-144) after 15 years and 139±7 &mgr;mol/l (range 132-151) after 20 years had developed ESRD or a clinically important reduction in renal function. Conclusion. The main finding in this population-based study of white middle-aged men with primary non-malignant hypertension was that long-term antihypertensive treatment was not associated with development of end-stage renal disease or even an abnormal progressive decline in kidney function. Keywords: primary hypertension; renal function; antihypertensive treatment; population-based; epidemiology
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
I. Dasgupta, C. Porter, A. Innes, and R. Burden
'Benign' hypertensive nephrosclerosis
QJM, February 1, 2007; 100(2): 113 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
R. G. Luke
Hypertensive nephrosclerosis: pathogenesis and prevalence : Essential hypertension is an important cause of end-stage renal disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2271 - 2278.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.