Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kolmos, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kolmos, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 11 2847-2852, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Dialysis catheter-related septicaemia - focus on Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia

J Nielsen, S Ladefoged and H Kolmos
Departments of Clinical Microbiology and Nephrology, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegård Allé 30, DK-2640 Hvidovre, Denmark; Corresponding author

Background: Dialysis catheters are a common cause of nosocomial septicaemia in haemodialysis units-usually due to staphylococci, of which Staphylococcus aureus is the most pathogenic. In this study, the epidemiology and pathogenesis of dialysis catheter-related infections were studied, and methods to identify patients with these infections were evaluated. Methods: A one-year prospective study of 67 catheters in 43 haemodialysis patients were performed. Details about patients and catheters were obtained successively during the catheter period, and biochemical parameters expected to be related to infection were measured. After catheter insertion, all patients were screened for nasal carriage of S.aureus, and a culture was taken from the skin overlying the catheter insertion site. Once a week, cultures were taken from the insertion site and from the hub, and aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures were drawn from the catheter. If clinical signs of septicaemia occurred, peripheral blood cultures were also performed, when it was possible. Results: The incidence of septicaemia was 49% (21/43) in patients, and 56% of all cases were caused by S.aureus. The mortality was 14% (3/21) and the incidence of severe secondary complications to septicaemia was 24% (5/31). In all, 80% of all severe complications and 75% of all deaths from septicaemia were due to S.aureus. With respect to S.aureus septicaemia, the predictive values of positive (P) and negative (N) S.aureus cultures were as follows: nasal culture, P=36% (10/28), N=90% (35/39); culture from the insertion site, P=72% (13/18), N=98% (48/49); and culture from the hub, P=75% (3/4), N=83% (52/63). The risk ratio for S.aureus septicaemia was 26.2 (6.1-113), P=0.0001, according to the presence of S.aureus at the insertion site, and 3.3 (0.74-15.1), P=0.12 according to nasal carriage of S.aureus. The frequency of S.aureus phage-type Group 2 (43%) was much higher than the general frequency of this phage-type in Denmark, which is about 23%. Catheter blood cultures were positive although there were no clinical signs of septicaemia in 34% (23/67) of all catheter periods-84% of these were due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Conclusions: Dialysis catheter-related S.aureus septicaemia was highly unlikely if the patient had not been carrying S.aureus in the nose or at the insertion site during the time the catheter was in place. The best predictor of dialysis catheter-related S.aureus septicaemia was a positive S.aureus culture from the insertion site. Positive catheter blood cultures unrelated to any clinical signs of septicaemia occurred in one-third of all catheter periods, and 84% of these were due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Key words: central venous-catheters; diagnosis; dialysis; dialysis catheters; septicaemia; Staphylococcus aureus
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
Y. Li, J. Y. Friedman, B. F. O'Neal, M. J. Hohenboken, R. I. Griffiths, M. E. Stryjewski, J. P. Middleton, K. A. Schulman, J. K. Inrig, V. G. Fowler Jr, et al.
Outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2009; 4(2): 428 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Mickley
Surgical alternatives to central venous catheters in chronic renal replacement therapy
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1045 - 1051.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
C. E. Lok, K. E. Stanley, J. E. Hux, R. Richardson, S. W. Tobe, and J. Conly
Hemodialysis Infection Prevention with Polysporin Ointment
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 169 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
V. Mickley
Central venous catheters: many questions, few answers
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1368 - 1373.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
F. Ewing, D. Patel, A. Petherick, R. Winney, and K. McBride
Radiological placement of the AshSplit haemodialysis catheter: a prospective analysis of outcome and complications
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 614 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. X. Zaleski, B. Funaki, J. Rosenblum, J. Theoharis, and J. Leef
Metallic Stents Deployed in Synthetic Arteriovenous Hemodialysis Grafts
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1515 - 1519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.