Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (76)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 1 160-164, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Suppression of the humoral immune response by mycophenolate mofetil

K Smith, N Isbel, M Catton, J Leydon, G Becker and R Walker
Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Fairfield, Victoria, Australia; Corresponding author at: Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 157, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK

Background: No conventional immunosuppressive agent preferentially inhibits antibody production. Studies in experimental animals and in human cells in vitro suggested mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) might have such an effect. If this was the case in vivo it could have significant implications in terms of both MMF toxicity and the rational design of immunotherapeutic regimens. Methods: Subjects were renal transplant recipients (25 patients treated with prednisolone, cyclosporine and azathiprine, and 13 treated with prednisolone, cyclosporine and MME) and 20 normal controls. The three groups received influenza vaccination, and the antibody response to it was measured 4-6 weeks later using a standard haemagglutination assay. Results: MMF profoundly suppressed the humoral immune response to influenza vaccination when added to prednisolone and cyclosporine. This effect could be seen when comparing the rise in the mean titre of antibody after vaccination. It was also reflected in the number of patients mounting responses deemed to be clinically protective by either demonstrating a 4-fold rise in titre or an increase in titre to ⩾50. Conclusions: Suppression of the humoral immune response by MMF has implications for the design of immunization protocols to protect the immunosuppressed, and raises the possibility that MMF use may be accompanied by more or different infections than complicate more conventional immunosuppression. More importantly, consideration should be given to harnessing the relatively specific effect of MMF on antibody production to treat antibody-mediated diseases. Key words: antibodies; humoral immunity; influenza vaccination; mycophenolate mofetil; renal transplantation
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
J. E. Davis, M. A. Sherritt, M. Bharadwaj, L. E. Morrison, S. L. Elliott, L. M. Kear, J. Maddicks-Law, T. Kotsimbos, D. Gill, M. Malouf, et al.
Determining virological, serological and immunological parameters of EBV infection in the development of PTLD
Int. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 16(7): 983 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. E. Shaddy, T. C. Fuller, J. B. Anderson, L. M. Lambert, M. K. Brinkman, T. Profaizer, and J. A. Hawkins
Mycophenolic mofetil reduces the HLA antibody response of children to valved allograft implantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 77(5): 1734 - 1739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P.J. Mazzone, S.B. Mossad, S.D. Mawhorter, A.C. Mehta, R.J. Schilz, and J.R. Maurer
The humoral immune response to influenza vaccination in lung transplant patients
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2001; 18(6): 971 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Karpinski, D. Rush, J. Jeffery, M. Exner, H. Regele, S. Dancea, D. Pochinco, P. Birk, and P. Nickerson
Flow Cytometric Crossmatching in Primary Renal Transplant Recipients with a Negative Anti-Human Globulin Enhanced Cytotoxicity Crossmatch
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2001; 12(12): 2807 - 2814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Badid, A. Desmouliere, and M. Laville
Mycophenolate mofetil: implications for the treatment of glomerular disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1752 - 1756.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. J. Reed, G. J. M. Alexander, S. Thiru, and K. G. C. Smith
Hepatitis C-associated glomerulonephritis--a novel therapeutic approach
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 869 - 871.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
D Adu, J Cross, and D R. Jayne
Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus with mycophenolate mofetil
Lupus, March 1, 2001; 10(3): 203 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Garcia-Canton, A. Toledo, R. Palomar, F. Fernandez, J. Lopez, A. Moreno, N. Esparza, S. Suria, P. Rossique, J. M. Diaz, et al.
Goodpasture's syndrome treated with mycophenolate mofetil
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 920 - 922.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. G. ter Meulen, J. F. M. Wetzels, and L. B. Hilbrands
The influence of mycophenolate mofetil on the incidence and severity of primary cytomegalovirus infections and disease after renal transplantation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 711 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.