Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulvihill, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cazenave, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mulvihill, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cazenave, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 9 1968-1973, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


TECHNICAL REPORT

Evaluation of haemodialysis membrane biocompatibility by parallel assessment in an ex vivo model in health y volunteers

J Mulvihill, T Crost, J Renaux and J Cazenave
INSERM U.211, Laboratoire de Biologie et Pharmacologie des Interactions du Sang avec les Vaisseaux et les Biomateriaux, Etablissement de Transfusion Sanguine, Strasbourg, France; Hospal R & D Int. Meyzieu, France; Corresponding author at: Etablissement de Transfusion Sanguine, BP No. 36, 10 rue Spielmann, 67065 Strasbourg Cedex, France

Background. Precise evaluation of the haemocompatibility of prototype membranes, flow configurations and anticoagulant regimens is an essential step in the development of dialysis systems minimizing blood activation. An ex vivo model in humans currently employed in our laboratory has recently been adapted to allow the parallel evaluation of two minimodule dialysers with blood from a single donor, thus eliminating differences due to donor variability in the comparison of test and control dialysis modules. Methods. The ex vivo flow system is designed to reproduce the haemodynamic conditions of clinical dialysis on a 1/50 scale. A blood line from the forearm vein of the volunteer donor is divided at a Y-shaped junction, two roller pumps assure equivalent blood flow (5 ml/min) in the branches leading to two minimodule dialysers and heparin (0.1 IU/ml final concentration) is injected into each branch immediately after the Y junction. Samples for analysis of blood activation markers are collected at the exits of the two minimodules over a test period of 27 min In the present series of tests, a new polyacrylonitirile membrane (PAN) was evaluated relative to standard commercial polysulphone (PS), acrylonitrile copolymer (AN 69) and cuprophan (CUP) membranes. Results. A steady minimal level of anticoagulation corresponding to a slightly less than two-fold prolongation of APTT (activated partial thromboplastin time) was maintained throughout testing in both branches of the ex vivo flow system. Time curves for the accumulation of activation markers (thrombin-antithrombin II complexes, prothrombin fragment 1+2, platelet {beta}-thromboglobulin, and complement fragment C3a) showed all four types of minimodule dialyser to induce comparable low levels of activation of coagulation parameters and platelets, together with similar mild activation of complement for AN 69, PAN, and PS dialysers as compared to stronger activation for CUP modules. Overall results thus confirmed the acceptable haemocompatibility of the prototype polyacrylonitrile (PAN) membrane. Conclusions. Among current methods for evaluation of the biocompatibility of haemodialysis systems, ex vivo flow models in humans avoid problems arising from species differences and may be designed to closely reproduce the conditions of clinical dialysis. A parallel configuration eliminates artefacts due to individual variations in donor response. This not only facilitates the direct comparison of test and control membranes under close to identical experimental conditions, but also provides a model particularly well adapted to studies of the effects of different anticoagulation regimens, flow configurations and dialysates, or alternative methods of sterilization, rinsing and priming of the dialysers. Keywords: biocompatibilty; haemodialysis; ex vivo model; polyacrylonitrile; hollow-fibre membrane; parallel flow system
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Chanard, S. Lavaud, H. Maheut, I. Kazes, F. Vitry, and P. Rieu
The clinical evaluation of low-dose heparin in haemodialysis: a prospective study using the heparin-coated AN69 ST membrane
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 2003 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Lavaud, E. Canivet, A. Wuillai, H. Maheut, C. Randoux, J.-M. Bonnet, J.-L. Renaux, and J. Chanard
Optimal anticoagulation strategy in haemodialysis with heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2097 - 2104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Chanard, S. Lavaud, C. Randoux, and P. Rieu
New insights in dialysis membrane biocompatibility: relevance of adsorption properties and heparin binding
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 252 - 257.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.