Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Filler, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrich, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Filler, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrich, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 8 1668-1671, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK 506) in children and adolescents with renal transplants

G Filler, R Grygas, I Mai, H Stolpe, C Greiner, S Bauer and J Ehrich
Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Charite Children's Hospital, Humboldt University Berlin, Schumannstrasse 20-21, D-10098 Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany; Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Children's Hospital, University of Rostock, Germany; St George's Children's Hospital, Leipzig, Germany; Corresponding author

Background: Only few data exist on pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in children. Patients: In 1995 and 1996, 14 children (mean age 13 years, range 5-23 years) received tacrolimus after renal transplantation; 10 of these after biopsy-proven steroid-resistant rejection (2 with vascular rejection), two for cyclosporin A (CsA)-induced severe nephrotoxicity, one for untreatable gingival hyperplasia on CsA, and one child was treated primarily after transplantation because of severe liver involvement in nephronophthisis. Pharmacokinetic investigations were performed after establishing a stable maintenance dose with trough levels in the desired window of 5-12 ng/ml. Results: Mean follow-up time was 6 months (range 3-25 months). Eleven patients were still on tacrolimus. Two were discontinued because of severe aggravation of chronic persistent hepatitis C (one of them also developed diabetes mellitus),and one patient was subsequently switched to conventional immunosuppression because of tacrolimus-associated nephrotoxicity. All tacrolimus levels were measured by a modified assay (MEIA, Tacrolimus, Abbott) with improved sensitivity. At the time of switch, median serum creatinine was 234±82 7mgr;mol;l and 6 months after switch 201±99 &mgr;mol/l. All grafts are still functioning. Mean FK-506 dose was 0.16 mg/kg body weight/day (range 0.036-0.30 mg/kg). Mean trough level was 7.1±2.6 ng/ml in the morning and 6.5±2.0 ng/ml in the evening. Median time of maximum concentration (tmax) was 120 min after application, and the mean maximum concentration (Cmax) was 15.2±6.7 ng/ml. Mean area under the curve (AUC) was 104±33 ng * h/ml, with a range from 65 to 169 ng * h/ml. No patient had unsatisfactorily low trough levels during the study. There was only a weak but significant (P<0.05) correlation between dose per kg body weight and AUC and, as expected, an excellent correlation (r2=0.73, P<0.001) between AUC and trough level. Conclusion: Because of interindividual variation between patients, therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is mandatory. In this study, a daily dose of 0.15 mg/kg was sufficient in most patients. We recommend the performance of at least one pharmacokinetic study after establishing stable FK 506 trough levels to ascertain a safe profile. Keywords: renal transplantation; rescue therapy; tacrolimus; tacrolimus pharmacokinetics
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
H. Tada, S. Satoh, M. Iinuma, N. Shimoda, M. Murakami, Y. Hayase, T. Kato, and T. Suzuki
Chronopharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Occurrence of Acute Rejection
J. Clin. Pharmacol., August 1, 2003; 43(8): 859 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. L. KASISKE, M. A. VAZQUEZ, W. E. HARMON, R. S. BROWN, G. M. DANOVITCH, R. S. GASTON, D. ROTH, J. D. SCANDLING JR., and G. G. SINGER
Recommendations for the Outpatient Surveillance of Renal Transplant Recipients
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2000; 11 (90001): S1 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.