Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 6 1223-1228, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Reduced calcium dialysate in CAPD patients: efficacy and limitations

A Armstrong, J Beer, K Noonan and J Cunningham
Departments of Nephrology and Clinical Biochemistry, The Royal London Hospital and Medical College, London E1 1BB, UK; Corresponding author

Background. The increasing use of 'reduced calcium' dialysate in CAPD patients treated with calcium-based phosphate binders has raised concerns that this could lead to negative calcium balance, worsening hyperparathyroidism, and osteopenia. Methods. The present study was conducted to examine the possibilities (a) that 1.25 mM calcium dialysate leads to negative calcium balance and worsening hyperparathyroidism, and (b) that conversely 1.25 mM calcium dialysate is still too high for some patients. We studied 22 patients who, after a 2-month run in using 1.75 mM calcium dialysate and aluminium hydroxide binders, entered a 3-month phase of 1.25 mM calcium dialysate with continuation of aluminium hydroxide as the sole phosphate binder. The patients then entered a final 9-month phase in which dialysate calcium remained at 1.25 mM and calcium carbonate was substituted for aluminium hydroxide and progressively titrated to achieve optimum phosphate control. Results. During the initial 3-month period, parathyroid hormone increased from 259, range 11-1149 to 405, range 16-1318 pg/ml (P=0.0001) and ionized calcium decreased from 1.17±0.06 to 1.11±0.08 mM (P=0.0004). The subsequent 9-month phase was associated with return of parathyroid hormone to baseline levels. Further dialysate calcium reduction to 0.6 mM was implemented in the four patients, who became hypercalcaemic. Conclusion. This study has clearly shown that reduction of dialysate calcium to 1.25 mM can be harmful to CAPD patients if oral calcium availability is inadequate. It has also shown that dialysate calcium at 1.25 mM is a compromise, with increased risk of hyperparathyroidism if calcium intake is too low and, conversely, risk of hypercalcaemia and unacceptable increases of the Ca x Pi product in a minority of patients. At these extremes there is a need for a high-calcium dialysate (1.75 mM) and a very low-calcium dialysate (0.6 mM or less), to optimize management. Keywords: CAPD; calcium; PTH; dialysis
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Sanchez, F. Lopez-Barea, J. Sanchez-Cabezudo, A. Bajo, A. Mate, E. Martinez, and R. Selgas
Low vs standard calcium dialysate in peritoneal dialysis: differences in treatment, biochemistry and bone histomorphometry. A randomized multicentre study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1587 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.