Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Touchard, G.
Right arrow Articles by Preud'homme, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Touchard, G.
Right arrow Articles by Preud'homme, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 6 1199-1203, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

High prevalence and usual persistence of serum monoclonal immunoglobulins evidenced by sensitive methods in renal transplant recipients

G Touchard, T Pasdeloup, J Parpeix, T Hauet, M Bauwens, G Dumont, P Aucouturier and J Preud'homme
Department of Nephrology and Laboratory of Immunology and Immunopathology (CNRS URA 1172 Immunology and Molecular Interactions), Poitiers University Hospital, F86021 Poitiers, France; Corresponding author

Background. The occurrence of serum monoclonal immunoglobulins in kidney transplant recipients is well known but their significance and predictive value for the occurrence of lymphoma are a matter of debate. We therefore conducted a study of monoclonal immunoglobulins by a sensitive method during the long-term follow up of grafted patients. Methods. Monoclonal immunoglobulins were characterized by high-resolution electrophoresis, conventional immunoelectrophoretic analysis, and a sensitive Western blotting procedure in the serum from 84 renal transplant recipients prior to grafting and subsequently, with a 1-8-year follow-up and excluding the patients who developed posttransplant lymphoma. Results. Low abundance monoclonal immunoglobulins were detectable prior to transplantation in 56 cases (66.6%) and after graft in 72 cases (85.5%) (and in 1 case (1.2%) and 18 cases (21.4%) of cases respectively, by immunoelectrophoresis). These abnormalities were often multiple in individual sera. Monoclonal components detected by immunoblotting were transient in 23.8% of patients only (whereas those evidenced by immunoelectrophoresis usually became undetectable by this method) and their pattern was remarkably stable in the majority of cases. The frequency of post-transplant monoclonal immunoglobulins was higher in patients of more than 50 years of age than in younger patients. The appearance of monoclonal components after grafting and their transient character correlated with CMV infections. No correlation was found with various other parameters. The isotypic distribution of monoclonal immunoglobulins with an IgM, IgG3, and IgG1 predominance and an abnormally low &kgr;/&lgr; ratio was the same as that observed in various immuno-deficiency states. The monoclonal immunoglobulin pattern in three further patients who developed post-transplant lymphoma was unremarkable. Conclusion. Monoclonal immunoglobulins hence are not discriminant for lymphoma and their characterization does not appear to be necessary in the evaluation of followed up grafted patients, at least for a prediction of post-transplant lymphoma. Keywords: cytomegalovirus; immunoblotting; immunoelectrophoresis; kidney transplantation; monoclonal immunoglobulins; serum
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.