Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nyberg, G.
Right arrow Articles by Norden, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nyberg, G.
Right arrow Articles by Norden, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 3 559-563, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Gender differences in a kidney transplant population

G Nyberg, I Blohme and G Norden
Transplant Unit, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.

The purpose of this study was to compare female and male kidney transplant recipients. Of 1095 consecutive kidney transplants, 63.7% were to male recipients. Detailed demographic background data and follow-up data were used in the analysis. Female and male recipients were the same age, median 44, range 1-71 years. The male/female ratio was increased in all adult age groups, and most pronounced in the middle-aged. The proportions of first transplants and of preemptive transplants were not different, and 22.0% of men compared with 24.4% of women had living donors. Biopsy-verified chronic glomerulonephritis was found 2.4 times more often in men than in women, unknown diagnosis including non-biopsy-verified chronic glomerulonephritis 2.3 times, and adult dominant polycystic kidney disease 1.8 times. A larger proportion of men than women received antirejection treatment, 59.5% vs 49.5% (P = 0.002). Cumulative survival of patients or grafts was not different, but women > or = 50 years of age tended to have poorer 1-year graft survival than men, 69% vs 78% (P = 0.06). It is concluded that the increased proportion of men in our transplant programme is mainly due to their higher requirement of renal replacement therapy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
D. E. Schaubel, D. E. Stewart, H. I. Morrison, D. L. Zimmerman, J. I. Cameron, J. J. Jeffery, and S. S. A. Fenton
Sex Inequality in Kidney Transplantation Rates
Arch Intern Med, August 14, 2000; 160(15): 2349 - 2354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.