Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, M.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, M.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 12 2647-2653, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Vancomycin mass transfer characteristics of high-flux cellulosic dialysers

M Scott, B Mueller and W Clark
Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmacal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; Division of Nephrology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Corresponding author at: Renal Division, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, 1620 Waukegan Road; MPR-31, McGaw Park, IL 60085, USA

Background: In comparison to conventional haemodialysis membranes, highly permeable membranes allow a broader spectrum of solute removal, including enhanced elimination of vancomycin (1448 Daltons). However, the mass transfer characteristics of vancomycin removal by highly permeable membranes have not been adequately assessed. An understanding of vancomycin's predominant dialytic mass transfer mechanism under a given set of operating conditions, including dialyser type and flow rates, may permit more accurate dosing of the drug. Methods: We performed a mass transfer analysis of vancomycin removal by a high-flux dialyser, cellulose triacetate (CT). In a cross-over fashion with a 3-week washout between treatments, eight subjects received vancomycin 1000 mg (1) during the last hour of CT haemodialysis; or (2) after dialysis. Serial urea and vancomycin serum concentrations were used to assess dialytic removal. Results: Dialysis removed 26.2% (mean; range 16-44%) of the administered vancomycin dose. While vancomycin removal and (Kt/)urea were directly correlated (r=0.88; P <0.005), no correlation was observed between vancomycin removal and weight-normalized ultrafiltration rate. Conclusions: These findings suggest that for the CT dialyser and dialysis operating conditions employed in this study, vancomycin clearance was primarily mediated by diffusion. As such, these data challenge the general concept that convection is primarily responsible for the removal of solutes in the same molecular weight class as vancomycin during high-flux dialysis. Key words: convection; diffusion; haemodialyser; pharmacokinetics; vancomycin
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
B. S. Crawford, R. F. Largen, T. Walton, and J. J. Doran
Once-weekly vancomycin for patients receiving high-flux hemodialysis
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2008; 65(13): 1248 - 1253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
G. R. Matzke
Status of Hemodialysis of Drugs in 2002
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 1, 2002; 15(5): 405 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
W. R. CLARK, J. K. LEYPOLDT, L. W. HENDERSON, B. A. MUELLER, M. K. SCOTT, and E. F. VONESH
Quantifying the Effect of Changes in the Hemodialysis Prescription on Effective Solute Removal with a Mathematical Model
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 1999; 10(3): 601 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.