Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarif, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bakris, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarif, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bakris, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 11 2244-2250, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


PERSONAL OPINION

Preservation of renal function: the spectrum of effects by calcium-channel blockers

N Tarif and G Bakris
Nephrology Division, University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago, USA; The Rush University Hypertension Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Corresponding author at: Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite # 117, Chicago IL 60612, USA

The vast majority of animal data derived from models of either remnant kidney or diabetes demonstrate that dihydropyridine (nifedipine-like) calcium-channel blockers (DHPCCBs) effectively reduce arterial pressure but do not significantly affect proteinuria nor prevent development of glomerular scarring. Conversely, the non-DHPCCBs such as diltiazem and verapamil blunt both the rise in proteinuria as well as mesangial matrix expansion and subsequent glomerular scarring in diabetics. Additionally, the non-DHPCCBs markedly attenuate development of glomerular scarring in the remnant kidney model. The primary reasons for these differences between subclasses of CCBs relates to a lack of the following attributes by DHPCCBs: (1) they fail to reduce glomerular membrane permeability which is increased in these models; (2) they fail to affect the synthesis of certain key matrix proteins that perpetuate development of glomerular scarring (this effect may be due to the differential expression of calcium channels within the glomerular mesangium); and (3) the DHPCCBs totally abolish renal autoregulation in these models, an effect not observed with non-DHPCCBs. Taken together with long-term (<3 year) clinical studies, primarily in diabetic nephropathy, it is clear that the non-DHPCBs seem to offer protection to the kidney not available with DHPCCBs alone, unless systolic arterial pressure is reduced to levels of ⩽110 mmHg. Key words: calcium-channel blockers; glomerular filtration rate; albuminuria; proteinuria; hypertension; glomerulosclerosis
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
J. P Garg and G. L Bakris
Microalbuminuria: marker of vascular dysfunction, risk factor for cardiovascular disease
Vascular Medicine, February 1, 2002; 7(1): 35 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. Herlitz, K. Harris, T. Risler, G. Boner, J. Bernheim, J. Chanard, and M. Aurell
The effects of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist on the progression of renal disease: the Nephros Study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2158 - 2165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. Y. Agodoa, L. Appel, G. L. Bakris, G. Beck, J. Bourgoignie, J. P. Briggs, J. Charleston, D. Cheek, W. Cleveland, J. G. Douglas, et al.
Effect of Ramipril vs Amlodipine on Renal Outcomes in Hypertensive Nephrosclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, June 6, 2001; 285(21): 2719 - 2728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
Managing hypertension in patients with renal disease and diabetes
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 1, 2000; 162(11): 1555 - 1556.




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.